2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-004-8275-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid stakeholder and conflict assessment for natural resource management using cognitive mapping: The case of Damdoi Forest Enterprise, Vietnam

Abstract: Understanding stakeholders' perceptions and motivations is of significant importance in relation to conservation and protected area projects. The importance of stakeholder analysis is widely recognized as a necessary means for gaining insight into the complex systemic interactions between natural processes, management policies, and local people depending on the resource. Today, community and group-based participatory inquiry approaches are widely used for this purpose. Recently, participatory approaches have b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify relevant actors and their voices, we draw from the technique of stakeholder analysis, which has long been used to understand resource conflicts in environmental projects (de Lopez 2001, Hjortsø et al 2005, Mushove and Vogel 2005. A stakeholder may be defined as any individual or group either directly involved in, or affected by, the exploitation or management of a given resource, in this case, forests (following Grimble and Chan 1995).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify relevant actors and their voices, we draw from the technique of stakeholder analysis, which has long been used to understand resource conflicts in environmental projects (de Lopez 2001, Hjortsø et al 2005, Mushove and Vogel 2005. A stakeholder may be defined as any individual or group either directly involved in, or affected by, the exploitation or management of a given resource, in this case, forests (following Grimble and Chan 1995).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…È emerso che l'impiego delle mappe cognitive nella gestione forestale riveste un'importanza strategica come strumento di supporto del processo decisionale nei casi in cui le decisioni vengono prese da un gruppo di soggetti in modo interattivo (group decision making), come avviene normalmente nella pianificazione forestale partecipata. Infatti, le interazioni dirette (face-to-face) tra i partecipanti possono dare luogo a fenomeni come il pensiero di gruppo (groupthink), vale a dire la persuasione coercitiva e il rafforzamento delle posizioni di potere (Hjortsø et al 2005). Questi due fenomeni fanno sì che da un lato gli attori con un maggior prestigio e potere durante il processo partecipativo possono, in maniera più o meno consapevole, influenzare e modificare a proprio favore le posizioni degli altri portatori d'interessi.…”
Section: Conclusioniunclassified
“…In quest'ultimo caso mettono in evidenza gli elementi condivisi dai membri del gruppo e rappresentano la realtà da loro socialmente costruita (Codara 1998). Le applicazioni concrete delle mappe cognitive nella gestione delle risorse naturali sono ancora piuttosto limitate; tra gli esempi più interessanti merita segnalarne l'impiego nella gestione forestale sostenibile (GFS) in Zimbabwe (Mendoza & Prabhu 2003), nel coinvolgimento dei portatori d'interessi nella gestione delle foreste in Danimarca (Hjortsø et al 2005), nell'individuazione degli obiettivi gestionali dei proprietari forestali della Finlandia (Tikkanen et al 2006), nello studio della percezione sociale nei confronti di differenti ecosistemi umidi in Turchia (Dadaser & Özesmi 2002) e nell'indagare le conoscenze dei piccoli agricoltori del Ghana in merito alla gestione delle agroforestry (Isaac et al 2009). …”
unclassified
“…However, in 1992 only 51,000 ha of forest were remaining, due to the failure to prevent forest loss to other uses (Christensen et al, 2008;Clough et al, 2008). By the mid-1990s, a ban on forest felling became effective, forcing the forest enterprises to replant and protect the forests rather than just utilize them (Christensen et al, 2008;Hjortsø et al, 2005). However, despite the reforestation, the rate of mangrove destruction has been 4 to 10 times higher than reforestation, and all areas of mature mangrove forests in the site have been severely degraded (Buckton et al, 1999;Gebhardt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Wetland Conservation Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lewis (1996) pointed to two main reasons for conflict in protected area management: (1) the perceived incompatibility of meeting local people's resource needs and at the same time protecting nature; and (2) the lack of involvement of local people and others who care about the land and nature in the planning and decision-making processes concerning such resources. Understanding stakeholders' perceptions and motivations is of significant importance in relation to conservation and protected area projects (Hjortsø et al, 2005). The importance of stakeholder analysis is widely recognized as a means for gaining an insight into the complex systemic interactions between natural processes, management policies and local people who depend on the resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%