2022
DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement

Abstract: The demand for rapid reviews has exploded in recent years. A rapid review is an approach to evidence synthesis that provides timely information to decision-makers (eg, health care planners, providers, policymakers, patients) by simplifying the evidence synthesis process. A rapid review is particularly appealing for urgent decisions. JBI is a world-renowned international collaboration for evidence synthesis and implementation methodologies. The principles for JBI evidence synthesis include comprehensiveness, ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapid reviews are a form of evidence synthesis that can provide timelier decision-making information than standard systematic reviews. They are suitable for emerging research topics where systematic reviews are unpractical [ 17 ]. Rapid reviews typically do not include an exhaustive set of studies, do not involve formal analyses of the study quality, and report findings from prior studies via narrative synthesis by simplifying the evidence synthesis process [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid reviews are a form of evidence synthesis that can provide timelier decision-making information than standard systematic reviews. They are suitable for emerging research topics where systematic reviews are unpractical [ 17 ]. Rapid reviews typically do not include an exhaustive set of studies, do not involve formal analyses of the study quality, and report findings from prior studies via narrative synthesis by simplifying the evidence synthesis process [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature search strategy followed rapid review procedure ( 14 ). The period 1st January 1995 to 14th July 2022 used covers the period since HJP were first reported ( 15 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has the following two limitations: first, we have searched the following databases-PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google; therefore, we may have missed some other literature that is published in journals that are not indexed in PubMed and PubMed Central. Secondly, the aim of the rapid review was to identify the literature on patient safety in Tanzania in terms of its key findings and issues in order to inform future improvement steps; in the execution of the review, we may not have adequately fulfilled all the steps but we believe we have tried to the best to be comprehensive and transparent as possible in the process [119]. The results obtained are adequate for informing and understanding of patient safety efforts in the past two decades (2002-2022); and hence, can contribute to future efforts to ensure patient safety in Tanzania for the period 2022-2030.…”
Section: Pittalis C [91] 2019 Safe Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%