1979
DOI: 10.1039/c39790000498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid reversible fission of a C–H bond in a metal complex: X-ray crystal structure of [RhHCl(But2PCH2CH2CHCH2CH2PBut2)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of the Pd 0 complex did not significantly increase if heating was prolonged (to 20 min). The 31 P coordination chemical shift is similar to the known value for Pd 0 (P(OMe) 3 ) 4 /P(OMe) 3 (∆δ = 21 ppm [26] ) whereas PdCl 2 (P(OEt) 3 ) 2 displays an upfield shift (δ = 92.0, ∆δ = -46 ppm [27] ). On addition of 1a or 2a the Pd 0 complex is no longer detectable by 31 P NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Remarks On Mechanistic Aspectssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The amount of the Pd 0 complex did not significantly increase if heating was prolonged (to 20 min). The 31 P coordination chemical shift is similar to the known value for Pd 0 (P(OMe) 3 ) 4 /P(OMe) 3 (∆δ = 21 ppm [26] ) whereas PdCl 2 (P(OEt) 3 ) 2 displays an upfield shift (δ = 92.0, ∆δ = -46 ppm [27] ). On addition of 1a or 2a the Pd 0 complex is no longer detectable by 31 P NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Remarks On Mechanistic Aspectssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The two RhÀP bond lengths are slightly longer than in the related, more symmetrical chelate complex [RhHCl-(tBu 2 PCH 2 C 6 H 3 CH 2 PtBu 2 -k 3 P,C,P)] (18) obtained from RhCl 3 ¥ 3 H 2 O and 1.5-C 6 H 4 (CH 2 PtBu 2 ) 2 in 2-propanol/water under reflux. [16] In contrast, the RhÀC31 bond length of 17 (1.967(5) ä) is slightly shorter than in 18 (1.999(7) ä) and in the related hydrido and methyl complexes [RhHCl{CH(CH 2 CH 2 PtBu 2 ) 2 -k 3 P,C,P}] (2.082(2) ä) [17] and [RhCH 3 Cl{tBu 2 PCH 2 C 6 H-3.5-(CH 3 ) 2 CH 2 PtBu 2 -k 3 P,C,P}] (2.02(2) ä), [18] respectively. The P1-Rh-P2 axis of 17 is significantly bent (160.18 (5)8), which could be due both to steric hindrance between the phosphane substituents and the strain of the chelate ring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In this respect, pincer ligands with a C−C double bond as a central donating group are interesting since an olefin moiety can interact with the metal atom in several ways, by for example coordination in an η 2 -fashion, oxidative addition of one of the vinylic C−H bonds, or acting as a hydrogen acceptor. A few examples of compounds falling into the formal definition of a pincer complex but with a central alkene group are reported in the literature, 5 but little is known about their properties. A limited number of studies include Bennett's work on some complexes of 2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-trans-stilbene 6 and a recent publication from Iluc 7 about complexation with related 2,2′-bis(di-isopropylphosphino)-trans-stilbene.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%