2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(00)00222-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid relaxation times measurements by MRI: an in vivo application to contrast agent modeling for muscle fiber types characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing that Gd‐DOTA relaxivities measured in plasma at 37°C and at 3T are very close: r 1 = 3.5 L/mmol/s and r 2 = 4.9 L/mmol/s (27), some variation in muscle T 2 might at first glance have been expected following the CA injection. Assuming also almost identical r 1 and r 2 relaxivities of Gd‐DOTA CA in skeletal muscle, as was demonstrated at 1T in rabbit muscles (28), the estimated change in T 2 in our experimental setting was calculated to be only of 0.5 msec. The small amplitude of this effect is easily explained by the already fast intrinsic T 2 relaxation of skeletal muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Knowing that Gd‐DOTA relaxivities measured in plasma at 37°C and at 3T are very close: r 1 = 3.5 L/mmol/s and r 2 = 4.9 L/mmol/s (27), some variation in muscle T 2 might at first glance have been expected following the CA injection. Assuming also almost identical r 1 and r 2 relaxivities of Gd‐DOTA CA in skeletal muscle, as was demonstrated at 1T in rabbit muscles (28), the estimated change in T 2 in our experimental setting was calculated to be only of 0.5 msec. The small amplitude of this effect is easily explained by the already fast intrinsic T 2 relaxation of skeletal muscle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…About 2000 noisy decay curves were simulated for various SNR values. For monoexponential decay, T 2 was assumed to be around 40 ms (Dedieu et al 2000, Stanisz et al 2005. For biexponential decay, relaxation tissue parameters were those of fat with two proton components having a short and a long relaxation times, T 2s ∼ 40 ms and T 2l ∼ 150 ms with relative fractions a s ∼ 70% and a l ∼ 30%, respectively (Kamman et al 1987, Brix et al 1993.…”
Section: Uncertainty In T 2 Measurements: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (λ 0 ) represents the value of the relaxometry parameters obtained from a noise-free decay curve. In this study, for both the adipose and neighbouring muscle tissues to be analysed by quantitative MRI, the protons can be divided into two populations, with short T 2s and long T 2l transverse relaxation times, with relative proportions a s and a l respectively (Fransson et al 1993, Hazlewood et al 1969, Clark et al 2003, Dedieu et al 2000. In such a case, according to relation 1, the pixel signal is biexponential:…”
Section: Precision Of Mri Relaxometry Parameter Determination: Simula...mentioning
confidence: 99%