2021
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Progress in the Use of Immunomodulatory Drugs and Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the improvement in our understanding of the biology of MM and the introduction of new drug classes, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PI), and monoclonal antibodies (MoAb), have significantly improved outcomes. The first IMiD introduced to treat MM was thalidomide. The side effects observed during treatment with thalidomide initiated work on the synthesis of IMiD analogs. Subsequently, lenalidomide and pomalidomide were developed, both with different sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL1-β were reduced in plasma from stroke animals, whereas anti-inflammatory IL-10 was elevated for 3,6′-DP. Although both 3,6′-DP and 1,6′-DP bound to human cereblon, 3,6′-DP did not activate processes resulting in the degradation of Ikaros, Aiolos and SAL4 that are central in anticancer and teratogenicity actions of IMiDs [ 16 , 17 ]. Neither 3,6′-DP nor 1,6′-DP had any unfavorable actions in the mammalian chromosome aberration assay and the AMES fluctuation assay, key assessments of potential genotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL1-β were reduced in plasma from stroke animals, whereas anti-inflammatory IL-10 was elevated for 3,6′-DP. Although both 3,6′-DP and 1,6′-DP bound to human cereblon, 3,6′-DP did not activate processes resulting in the degradation of Ikaros, Aiolos and SAL4 that are central in anticancer and teratogenicity actions of IMiDs [ 16 , 17 ]. Neither 3,6′-DP nor 1,6′-DP had any unfavorable actions in the mammalian chromosome aberration assay and the AMES fluctuation assay, key assessments of potential genotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like pomalidomide, both agents reduce ischemic stroke infarct volume and associated behavioral impairment. However, although, similar to pomalidomide, 3,6′-DP potently binds to cereblon, and it importantly does not appear to induce the ubiquitination of key downstream neo-substrates (Ikaros, Aiolos and SALL4) associated with the anticancer/teratogenicity of the IMiD drug class [ 16 , 17 , 27 ]. 3,6′-DP and 1,6′-DP lack activity in essential gatekeeper genotoxicity and hERG assays critical to human translation, and, in the light of their clear efficacy signal in the current study, they thus warrant further evaluation and development in preclinical animal models as candidate drugs to mitigate inflammation associated with excessive pro-inflammatory cytokine generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before the clarification of the molecular mechanism of action, thalidomide and its analogues were characterized by modulation of T cells, NK and NK-T cells functions by inducing the production of cytokines, including IL-2 (interleukin-2) and interferon-γ [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Thus, thalidomide and its analogs are called immunomodulatory drugs in addition to their anti-angiogenic activity, disruption of the myeloma cell-bone marrow stromal interaction, and downregulation of osteoclastogenesis [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Immunomodulatory Drugs (Imids)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are oral anti-myeloma drugs, pioneered by thalidomide, and have been the mainstay of myeloma therapy since 1999. In a review by Charlinski and co-workers [ 3 ], detailed insight is provided on their mode of action through the modulation of cereblon ubiquitin ligase activity, the main target of all IMiDs. Though highly similar in chemical structure, IMiDs differ in not only their anti-myeloma activity, but their side effect profile, too.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%