2002
DOI: 10.1021/ie010732f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Nucleophilic/Oxidative Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
198
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of temperature on BIS decontamination is discussed in more detail below. These values are also comparable to those obtained by Wagner and Yang (2002), who found DECON Green to be 87% effective and DS2 to be 72% effective in removing VX from a CARC panel at room temperature.…”
Section: Decon Green Effectsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of temperature on BIS decontamination is discussed in more detail below. These values are also comparable to those obtained by Wagner and Yang (2002), who found DECON Green to be 87% effective and DS2 to be 72% effective in removing VX from a CARC panel at room temperature.…”
Section: Decon Green Effectsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In terms of a mean efficiency for DECON Green against CEPS (10-120 minutes), values were calculated as 92% ± 4% for 4°C, 87% ± 6% for −5°C, and 93% ± 5% for −15°C, with no significant difference between the means at 4° and −15°C. These values are comparable to those obtained by Wagner and Yang (2002), who found DECON Green to be 90% effective and DS2 to be 86.7% effective in removing HD from a CARC panel at room temperature. In contrast and with one exception, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that there was no significant difference between means for BIS at any of the five decontamination times evaluated ( Table 2).…”
Section: Decon Green Effectsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations