2022
DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00235-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid monitoring of health services use following a policy to switch patients from originator to biosimilar etanercept—a cohort study in British Columbia

Abstract: Background Drug coverage policies that incentivize switching patients from originator to biosimilar products may result in significant health care savings. Our study aimed to detect early impacts on health services utilization following a mandated switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods We conducted a prospective, population-based cohort study using linked administrative health data from BC (2010–20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted a longitudinal and cross-sectional retrospective study using data obtained between 1996 and 2020 from the BC Ministry of Health Healthideas database that include dispensing data from all community pharmacies in the province 24. This database has been a source for multiple observational studies25 26 and includes information on patient demographics, drug dispensing records, outpatient physician fee-for-service claims, hospital admissions, and laboratory test results (from 2011 onwards). Detailed information on the dispensed medication, dispensing date, quantity and number of dispensed days supply is available in the database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a longitudinal and cross-sectional retrospective study using data obtained between 1996 and 2020 from the BC Ministry of Health Healthideas database that include dispensing data from all community pharmacies in the province 24. This database has been a source for multiple observational studies25 26 and includes information on patient demographics, drug dispensing records, outpatient physician fee-for-service claims, hospital admissions, and laboratory test results (from 2011 onwards). Detailed information on the dispensed medication, dispensing date, quantity and number of dispensed days supply is available in the database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as patients experiencing the outcome earlier without an overall change in the number of patients experiencing the outcome. The study method has been previously published [33,34,38,39]. Patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis were not analysed separately, because this was a signal detection analysis, with the goal of conducting quick and efficient analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent interventional and observational studies and systematic literature reviews found similar benefits and harms related to the biosimilar infliximab compared with the originator in adult [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]30] and pediatric patients [31] with IBD. However, data on the impact of policies for a nonmedical switch are lacking [9,[32][33][34], and in patients with IBDs, the surveillance to date has been limited to switching rates [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, we detected a small but significant downward trend in the post-switch period, potentially indicating treatment failure and switches back to the reference product. Studies examining biosimilar infliximab and etanercept switching in BC found no differences in health care utilization (e.g., emergency department visits or hospitalizations) post policy (27,28). Nevertheless, concerns around the use of biosimilars remain, stemming in part from their regulatory designation as similar but not identical to the reference product in terms of efficacy and safety, their interchangeability and substitutability, and the use of clinical trial data from one disease state to substantiate claims of efficacy and safety in another (i.e., extrapolation of indication), among other factors (13,(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%