2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.09083
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Mixing of Glauber Dynamics up to Uniqueness via Contraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the critical point for the uniqueness/non-uniqueness phase transition on the ∆-regular tree. By using Theorem 1.1 with known spectral independence calculations [CLV20b], together with a coupling argument of Hayes and Vigoda Moreover, there exists an algorithm which, given ε > 0, outputs (with constant probability) a (1 + ε)multiplicative approximation of Z G,λ in time Õδ (n 2 poly(1/ε)).…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…is the critical point for the uniqueness/non-uniqueness phase transition on the ∆-regular tree. By using Theorem 1.1 with known spectral independence calculations [CLV20b], together with a coupling argument of Hayes and Vigoda Moreover, there exists an algorithm which, given ε > 0, outputs (with constant probability) a (1 + ε)multiplicative approximation of Z G,λ in time Õδ (n 2 poly(1/ε)).…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O(n log n/δ) from a warm-start. By [CLV20b,Theorem 7], the Gibbs distribution is (C, η)-spectrally independent with C = O(δ −1 ), η = λ 1 + λ .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the most successful algorithms have been based on Markov chain simulation. Particularly prominent is the familiar Glauber dynamics [Gla63] whose mixing time has remained an active area of research, with wonderful new results coming in recent years [CLV20a;CLV20b], prompted by pioneering work on high dimensional expanders [KO20;ALGV18]. Deterministic approaches have also been proposed, based on decay of correlations [Wei06] or Taylor expansion in a zero-free region of the partition function [PR17;BS17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of [2] establishes that, for 2-spin systems, it suffices to bound the largest eigenvalue of the n × n influence matrix I where the (v, w) entry captures the influence of the fixed spin at vertex v on the marginal probability at vertex w; we explain this in more detail in Section 1.1. The running time of the result of [2] was further improved in [5], who also generalised the approach to antiferromagnetic 2-spin systems up to the tree-uniqueness threshold by showing how to utilize potential-function arguments that were previously used to establish SSM. Going beyond 2-spin systems, all of these methods become harder to control even well above the treeuniqueness threshold, q = ∆ + 1, which marks the onset of computational hardness (even for triangle-free graphs, see [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%