2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-018-1916-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid lymphatic efflux limits cerebrospinal fluid flow to the brain

Abstract: The relationships between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain interstitial fluid are still being elucidated. It has been proposed that CSF within the subarachnoid space will enter paravascular spaces along arteries to flush through the parenchyma of the brain. However, CSF also directly exits the subarachnoid space through the cribriform plate and other perineural routes to reach the lymphatic system. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the functional relationship between CSF efflux through lymphatics and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
210
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(79 reference statements)
24
210
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that lumbar intrathecal contrast delivery during infusion to assess glymphatic function in humans was proposed in Yang et al [70]. Further, as suggested by Ma et al [38] increased flow, and a possible change in ICP, may alter the distribution of CSF to different outflow pathways. In addition, if the glymphatic circulation is a main outflow route for CSF, the outflow resistance R out is a direct measure of glymphatic dysfunction, which in turn has been linked to neurodegenerative disorders [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that lumbar intrathecal contrast delivery during infusion to assess glymphatic function in humans was proposed in Yang et al [70]. Further, as suggested by Ma et al [38] increased flow, and a possible change in ICP, may alter the distribution of CSF to different outflow pathways. In addition, if the glymphatic circulation is a main outflow route for CSF, the outflow resistance R out is a direct measure of glymphatic dysfunction, which in turn has been linked to neurodegenerative disorders [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, pressure gradients in the SAS are likely less than 3 mmHg/m [44,55], and the transmantle pressure difference has been estimated to be no more than 0.03 mmHg [64]. Glymphatic circulation driven by local differences in pulsatile pressure of several mmHg also seems implausible, as the ICP wave is almost identical in time everywhere in the brain [13], with a maximal estimated pulsatile difference of approximately 0.2 mmHg [68] Ma et al [38] suggest that outflow through the cribriform plate dominates, but only when the total outflow from the SAS is large. We also found the relative distribution of flow to the different outflow pathways to be affected by infusion, but there are important differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such open communication would effectively eliminate potential pressure differences, which are necessary to drive glymphatic flow (Faghih & Sharp, 2018). In agreement with this view, recent work shows that even at very early time points, tracers are present in the paravascular spaces of both arteries and veins at the level of the SAS (Ma et al, 2018). Thus, it appears that these physical and anatomical features do not concur with the proposed bulk flow through the parenchyma according to the glymphatic theory.…”
Section: Driving Forces For Paravascular Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Again, net flow at the brain surface does not provide evidence for inflow along paravascular spaces around arteries into the brain. In fact, recent work shows that tracers do not appreciably enter the brain parenchyma after injection into the cisterna magna and rapidly leave the brain via the cribriform plate and other perineural pathways (Ma et al., ). However, the oscillations in pressure in the CSF compartment could play a role in the transport of solutes along paravascular spaces of penetrating arteries.…”
Section: Pressure Pulsationsmentioning
confidence: 99%