2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid loss of Paraguay's Atlantic forest and the status of protected areas — A Landsat assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
2
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
102
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite basing the entire classification on a single image, we were able to achieve an overall classification accuracy of 84%, with some individual classes being classified even more accurately. This value is comparable to other classifications for this region (Huang et al, 2007), which were achieved using integrative per-pixel methods and manual interpretation applied to multidate imagery and a simpler classification scheme. Our classification was achieved from a single image with all classes determined from one application of the classification algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Despite basing the entire classification on a single image, we were able to achieve an overall classification accuracy of 84%, with some individual classes being classified even more accurately. This value is comparable to other classifications for this region (Huang et al, 2007), which were achieved using integrative per-pixel methods and manual interpretation applied to multidate imagery and a simpler classification scheme. Our classification was achieved from a single image with all classes determined from one application of the classification algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In some cases, stronger actions should be taken, given that in most cases the Paraguayan 'Important Bird Areas' (IBAs) match with protected areas (Appendix II); but in those cases that do not match, then the IBAs have no official measures (Cartes & Yanosky, 2008). The increasingly accelerated habitat destruction and fragmentation in different Paraguayan habitat types lead to patches (as occurred with Atlantic Forest sensu, Huang et al, 2007) which will lead to the isolation of populations as stated by Smith et al (2014) for P. livida. Paraguay is a global focus of forest loss (Hansen et al, 2013), with a deforestation rate of 179,000 ha per year (FAO, 2010), given the advance of habitat transformation for soy and beef (Guereña & Riquelme, 2013).…”
Section: Parks Vol 212 November 2015mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the early 1970s, 73.4 per cent of the ecoregion was covered by forest; since then, the proportion of forested area was quickly reduced to 40.7 per cent by 1989 and further declined to 24.9 per cent by 2000. Paraguay's loss of nearly two thirds of its Atlantic forest between 1973 and 2000, is attributed to two competing deforestation processes: one by settlers and the other by large land owners, with the latter being far more devastating (Huang et al, 2007). In general, protected areas slowed down forest loss within their boundaries; while nearly 40 per cent of Paraguay's Atlantic forests that existed in 1989 were lost by 2000, most protected areas, especially the private ones, lost only small proportions of their forest during the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past four decades, Landsat remained the chief source of freely available remote sensing data for numerous applications. The spatial and spectral resolution of Landsat images makes these data highly suitable in analyzing both abrupt and gradual changes in vegetation cover and monitoring environmental processes such as degradation and desertification (Almeida-Filho & Shimabukuro 2002), deforestation (Cohen et al 2002;Huang et al 2007), habitat fragmentation (Millington et al 2003), forest succession (Song & Woodcock 2003), overgrazing (Jano et al 1998) and rangeland monitoring (Hostert et al 2003) etc. Figure 3 shows the Landsat 5 TM images of pre-and post-flood event of the study area in false colour composite of band 5, 4 and 3, which represent blue, red and infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%