2017
DOI: 10.1002/gch2.201700037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Liquid Recognition and Quality Inspection with Graphene Test Papers

Abstract: essential for meeting the future needs in various aspects of liquid monitoring.Conventional technologies of liquid sensing includes chemical analysis, spectroscopic analysis, liquid parameter analysis, bioelectronic/electronic tongue and chemiresistor. Chemical analysis method has a long history, e.g., titrimetry analysis and colorimetric analysis. As for it is dependent on a specific chemical reaction, it is targeted detection and could achieve qualitative/quantitative analysis. [6] Spectroscopic analysis ins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b) were extracted. Although the response of the FGD was comparable to the graphene one, the initial response of the FGD was noticeably larger than that of graphene at V bias = 0.01 V. Moreover, the sensitivity of the FGD was comparable or even superior to the reported liquid acetone sensors based on reduced GO (ΔR/R 0 =~45% for bilayer), graphene/cellulose nanocomposite (ΔR/R 0 = 2%-10%), and Co 3 O 4 -doped ZnO (ΔI/I 0 =~20%) [68][69][70]. R 0 and R represent the channel resistance before and after VOC liquids in contact with channels, respectively, and ΔR is the difference of R and R 0 .…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…4b) were extracted. Although the response of the FGD was comparable to the graphene one, the initial response of the FGD was noticeably larger than that of graphene at V bias = 0.01 V. Moreover, the sensitivity of the FGD was comparable or even superior to the reported liquid acetone sensors based on reduced GO (ΔR/R 0 =~45% for bilayer), graphene/cellulose nanocomposite (ΔR/R 0 = 2%-10%), and Co 3 O 4 -doped ZnO (ΔI/I 0 =~20%) [68][69][70]. R 0 and R represent the channel resistance before and after VOC liquids in contact with channels, respectively, and ΔR is the difference of R and R 0 .…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…First, it is known that the electrical current of a chemiresistor may change in response to the analyte that has a different chemical nature from that of the channel polymer material. [ 71–73 ] Therefore, the direction and magnitude of the current change may vary with different liquids. For example, the liquids in the first row (chloroform, hexane, diethyl ether, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at room temperature, the response to humidity was much higher, which could compromise sensor reliability. A flexible and portable chemiresistor-based G-cellulose nanocomposite test paper (NCTP) comprising a G-lamellar membrane on a polymer substrate was introduced by Jiang’s team for rapid liquid recognition [ 93 ]. In the proposed sensing platform, the liquid droplet would penetrate into NCTP, impact the contact state and the carrier density of the G-sheet, and alter the total resistance.…”
Section: Nanocarbon/polymer Composite As Chemiresistive Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%