2011
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid land use change after socio-economic disturbances: the collapse of the Soviet Union versus Chernobyl

Abstract: Land use change is a principal force and inherent element of global environmental change, threatening biodiversity, natural ecosystems, and their services. However, our ability to anticipate future land use change is severely limited by a lack of understanding of how major socio-economic disturbances (e.g., wars, revolutions, policy changes, and economic crises) affect land use. Here we explored to what extent socio-economic disturbances can shift land use systems onto a different trajectory, and whether this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This area has been closed since 1986 after the occurrence of the Chernobyl disaster, which is one of the major anthropogenic disasters of the last century. Within the Chernobyl zone, active vegetation growth and environmental recovery are observed and documented [4], which is also reflected in the results of the trend analysis. The observed positive trends in forest cover 32% of its area.…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This area has been closed since 1986 after the occurrence of the Chernobyl disaster, which is one of the major anthropogenic disasters of the last century. Within the Chernobyl zone, active vegetation growth and environmental recovery are observed and documented [4], which is also reflected in the results of the trend analysis. The observed positive trends in forest cover 32% of its area.…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 53%
“…We used a subtractive model for visualization, where the primary factors are illustrated with a pure color and the overlapping areas of influence are depicted by the intersection of colors. Although the studies have discussed the impact of climatic variation on land surface changes [33,55,56], very few of them have focused on the impact of environmental factors on land surface trends in Ukraine as opposed to management and land tenure factors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Our results show that the changes in land surface can be partially explained by the combination of thermal and water conditions.…”
Section: Factors Of Land Surface Dynamics In Ukrainementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LULC composition and change has already been linked to water quality declines (Foley et al, 2005), climate change at regional and global scales (Bonan, 1997, Lawrence & Chase, 2010Pielke et al, 1999Pielke et al, , 2002Pitman et al, 2011), carbon dioxide emissions (Houghton & Hackler, 2001), habitat loss (Seabloom, Dobson, & Stoms, 2002;Soule, 2001), species extinction (Davies et al, 2006), and declining air quality (Romero, Ihl, Rivera, Zalazar, & Azocar, 1999;Ross et al, 2006 between policy decisions, regulatory actions, and land use (Hostert et al, 2011;Lunetta, Knight, Ediriwickrema, Lyon, & Worthy, 2006). Continuous LULCC monitoring allows researchers to draw connections between land change and variables such as carbon storage, watershed protection, and other ecosystem services -information essential for the management of natural and anthropogenic resources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…migration, population growth etc.) (Geri et al, 2010), leading to illegal resource use (Kuemmerle et al, 2009), and expanse bare land (Hostert et al, 2011;Pongratz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%