2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-013-0695-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid in silico selection of an MCHR1 antagonists’ focused library from multi-million compounds’ repositories: biological evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept is well known in many scientific fields, where a number of definitions are limited when the service or product is received and meets the expectations expected by the client, including satisfaction of the needs and desires associated with the purchase process (Kotler et al, 2002). Bitner and Hubbert (1994) confirmed that the satisfaction is linked to customer service evaluation where it achieves his/her needs and wants, therefore, the companies nowadays focus on customer satisfaction and they work to study and analysis the customer behavior and his attitude from the service and extent of it.…”
Section: Customer Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept is well known in many scientific fields, where a number of definitions are limited when the service or product is received and meets the expectations expected by the client, including satisfaction of the needs and desires associated with the purchase process (Kotler et al, 2002). Bitner and Hubbert (1994) confirmed that the satisfaction is linked to customer service evaluation where it achieves his/her needs and wants, therefore, the companies nowadays focus on customer satisfaction and they work to study and analysis the customer behavior and his attitude from the service and extent of it.…”
Section: Customer Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the critical issues in 2D ligand-based similarity selection approaches is the novelty vs. similarity [41], thus, structural analysis of the hits is a necessary task after biological evaluation of the focused library. Novelty could mean different core structure (scaffold/chemotype) or in the case of linear compounds a different arrangement of the various motifs although in a different substitution pattern [42]. After diversity selection and visual inspection, we purchased 50 compounds, which contained 1,2,3-benzotriazoles (16), 1,2,4-triazoles (15), imidazoles (6), 3,1-benzoxazin-4-ones (5) and five unrelated (novel) chemotypes (see Supplementary Materials, Tables S2–S4) at T ≥ 0.65 Tanimoto similarity level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected compounds mainly reflected the parent (seed) compounds’ architecture. In our previous studies, we experienced only swapping of the fragments with linear molecules as primary changes at T > 0.65 similarity level .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that random screening of a discovery library often results in a poor hit rate (≤0.1%), we have decided to select 5‐HT 6 target‐focused libraries for screening. We applied a two‐stage focused library selection strategy that we successfully validated earlier . In the first‐round screening, we selected the focused library by 2D similarity selection and property‐based filtering around the structure of biologically active reference compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%