Rapid Implementation of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives and Preferences of Patients with Cancer

Abstract

Introduction The use of telemedicine in oncology practice is rapidly expanding and is considered safe and cost effective. However, the implications of telemedicine on patient‐physician interaction, patient satisfaction, and absence of the personal touch have not been studied to date. Following the spread of COVID‐19, telemedicine services were rapidly incorporated at the Oncology Division of Tel Aviv Medical Center. We aimed to evaluate patients' perspectives and preferences regarding telemedicine and to assess whether this virtual communication platform affects the patient‐physician relationship. Methods Between March 2020 and May 2020, adult cancer patients who conducted at least one successful telemedicine meeting were interviewed by trained medical personnel. The interview was based on validated patient satisfaction questionnaires and focused on patient‐physician interaction in relation to the last in‐patient visit. Results Of 236 patients, 172 (74%) patients agreed to participate. The study population comprised mainly patients with gastrointestinal malignancies ( n = 79, 46%) with a median age of 63 years (range 21–88). The majority of patients were male ( n = 93, 54%). Eighty‐nine (51.7%) patients were receiving active oncologic treatment, and 58 (33.7%) were under routine surveillance following completion of active therapy. Almost all had a sense of secured privacy ( n = 171, 96%), the majority of patients affirmed that their concerns were met ( n = 166, 93%) and perceived that eye contact with the treating physician was perceived ( n = 156, 87%). Only a minority felt that the absence of physical clinic visits harmed their treatment ( n = 36, 20%). Most patients ( n = 146, 84.9%) wished to continue telemedicine services. A multivariate analysis revealed that higher satisfaction and visits for routine surveillance were both predictors of willingness to continue future telemedicine meetings over physical encounters (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41, p = .01; OR = 3.34, p = .03, respectively). Conclusion Telemedicine is perceived as safe and effective, and patients did not feel that it compromised medical care or the patient‐physician relationship. Integration of telemedicine is ideal for patients under surveillance after completion of active oncologic treatment. Physician communication skills workshops are warranted with implementing this platform. Implications for Practice During the COVID‐19 pandemic, telemedicine was rapidly implemented worldwide to facilitate continuity of quality care and treatment. Despite many potential setbacks, telemedicine has become a useful and safe tool for oncology practitioners to care for their pa...

Economic distress, financial toxicity, and medical cost‐coping in young adult cancer survivors during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Findings from an online sample

“…43 Emerging evidence suggests high levels of patient satisfaction and confidence with telemedicine visits during COVID-19 and, among adult survivors of childhood cancers, a preference for telemedicine visits over in-person visits. 44,45 Telemedicine may, however, present difficulties for YAs in rural areas with unreliable internet service or for those with limited English proficiency, who may require coordination with a medical interpreter. Although YAs in the United States generally report high access to and comfort with digital tools, this should not be assumed.…”

The Utilization and Benefits of Telehealth Services by Health Care Professionals Managing Breast Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…The results suggested high patient satisfaction and perception of the technology as safe and effective (Figure 2). However, approximately one-third of the patients felt that the absence of face-to-face visits compromised their treatment although most wished to continue with telemedicine services [78]. In another recent study that examined the implementation and usage of telemedicine amidst the COVID-19 pandemic involving 1762 cancer patients, there were high levels of satisfaction among patients (92.6%) and their clinicians (65.2%) with telehealth video visits [122].…”

Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer

“…In recent years, various ways of administering telehealth have been established, especially utilizing telephone, text messages, wearable technology, video consultations, or a combination of these [11]. As an alternative to traditional face-to-face consultations, digital consultations (e.g., telephone or video) provide a promising service model for patients or clinicians who are self-isolated or live far away from the hospital [12]. Video consultations improve access to care but there is the risk that patients and clinicians find them less acceptable due to technical, logistical, and regulatory challenges [13,14].…”