2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid identification of Bactrocera zonata (Dip.: Tephritidae) using TaqMan real-time PCR assay

Abstract: Tephritid fruit flies are ranked as one of the most damaging groups of insect pests. Morphological identification of fruit flies is mainly performed on adults due to the lack of adequate identification keys for immature stages. The peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders), infests some of the principal commercial fruits and vegetables. It is, therefore important to avert its global dispersal, particularly by accurately identifying this species at ports of entry. In this study, a TaqMan real-time polymeras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten samples in triplicate, diluted to a final concentration of 5 ng/µL, were tested in two separate series for repeatability. The reproducibility of each protocol was assessed in the same way as carried out for the repeatability by comparing the data of two series of samples by two different operators on different days (Dhami et al 2016 ; Koohkanzade et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten samples in triplicate, diluted to a final concentration of 5 ng/µL, were tested in two separate series for repeatability. The reproducibility of each protocol was assessed in the same way as carried out for the repeatability by comparing the data of two series of samples by two different operators on different days (Dhami et al 2016 ; Koohkanzade et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the repeatability, we tested ten samples in triplicate in two separate runs and calculated the % CV for each sample. To estimate reproducibility, the data of the two runs were compared [37,38].…”
Section: Repeatability and Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the repeatability test, 10 samples diluted to 5 ng/µl, run in triplicate and in two separate series, were used. The mean values, SD, and % CV were calculated for each sample and for each series of samples (Dhami et al 2016, Koohkanzade et al 2018. The reproducibility for each protocol was tested in the same way as the repeatability test but with two different operators, on different days, and comparing the data of the two sample series.…”
Section: Repeatability and Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%