Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death due to infectious diseases worldwide (4), although various drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis are available. One of the mainstay drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis is isoniazid (INH). Its effectiveness against M. tuberculosis was initially reported in 1952 (3, 15). Today, INH-resistant M. tuberculosis organisms are not rare anymore; prevalence was reported to be 7% in a recent study performed in The Netherlands (25). The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains (resistant to at least INH and rifampin) (7,11,12,20) has further complicated the treatment of tuberculosis. Therefore, and because of the organism's slow growth rate, rapid methods for detecting drug resistance in clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis are required. The primary mechanism of resistance in M. tuberculosis is the accumulation of mutations in genes coding for drug targets or drug-converting enzymes (16).In the last decade, mutations in katG (24, 26) and inhA (2) have been found to account for 60 to 70% and 10 to 15% of INH resistance cases among M. tuberculosis isolates, respectively (11). The two predominant mutations of katG, and those most referred to, are found within codons 315 and 463 (17).The mutation at codon 315 has been found to be an important indicator for INH resistance as well as for multidrug resistance among isolates of M. tuberculosis organisms recovered from patients in The Netherlands (25).The aims of this study were to assess whether the Arg463Leu mutation is also predictive of INH resistance and, if so, to develop a diagnostic PCR-based screening method for this type of INH resistance.(This work was presented in part at the 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Toronto, Canada, 17 to 20 September 2000.)
M. tuberculosis isolates and assessment of INH resistance.M. tuberculosis isolates from 395 patients who were diagnosed with tuberculosis in The Netherlands in the period of 1993 to 1997 were used in this study. The isolates were sent by medical microbiology laboratories in The Netherlands to the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) for routine typing and susceptibility tests. Susceptibility to INH was measured with the MIC method using 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 g of INH/ml in Middlebrook 7H10 medium (8). Isolates were considered resistant if more than 1% of the bacteria in the inoculum grew in the presence of INH concentrations of Ő1 g/ml. If growth of more than 1% of the inoculum in the presence of 0.5 g of INH/ml occurred, then the isolates were classified as having intermediate susceptibility.DNA isolation. M. tuberculosis isolates were grown on Lö-wenstein-Jensen solid medium or Middlebrook 7H9 liquid medium for 7 days to an optical density corresponding to 10 8 bacteria/ml and were harvested by centrifugation (4,500 Ï« g for 15 min). Chromosomal DNA was isolated as described by Ausubel et al. (1). Briefly, the bacteria were killed by heating at 80°C for 20 min and the...