1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79718-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid fluctuations in transmitter release from single vesicles in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells

Abstract: Single-vesicle release of catecholamines from chromaffin cells can be detected in real time as current spikes by the electrochemical method of amperometry. About 70% of spikes are preceded by a small "foot," the trickle of transmitter out of the early fusion pore. In addition, 20-50% of foot signals exhibit rapid fluctuations that we interpret as flickering of the fusion pore. There are also "stand-alone" foot signals, which may reflect transient fusions, in which the vesicles do not collapse completely into t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
152
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
22
152
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with recent findings suggesting that, in the immature hippocampus, silent synapses containing an appreciable number of AMPA receptors appear silent because the peak of glutamate concentration in the synaptic cleft is too low to activate low-affinity AMPA receptors (25). Low levels of glutamate could arise either from spillover of neurotransmitter from neighboring terminals (34)(35)(36) and͞or by the trickle of neurotransmitter from a fusion pore as occurs in neuronal (37) or non-neuronal secretory cells (38)(39)(40). According to the spillover hypothesis, only high-affinity NMDA receptors, but not low-affinity AMPA receptors, would be activated by the low concentration of glutamate diffused from a neighboring synapse (35,41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with recent findings suggesting that, in the immature hippocampus, silent synapses containing an appreciable number of AMPA receptors appear silent because the peak of glutamate concentration in the synaptic cleft is too low to activate low-affinity AMPA receptors (25). Low levels of glutamate could arise either from spillover of neurotransmitter from neighboring terminals (34)(35)(36) and͞or by the trickle of neurotransmitter from a fusion pore as occurs in neuronal (37) or non-neuronal secretory cells (38)(39)(40). According to the spillover hypothesis, only high-affinity NMDA receptors, but not low-affinity AMPA receptors, would be activated by the low concentration of glutamate diffused from a neighboring synapse (35,41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, at physiological temperature, spillover would be limited by the higher rate of glutamate clearance from the extracellular space (34,36), and, therefore, the contribution of this mechanism should be minimal. Alternatively, release of a small amount of glutamate from a nonexpanding fusion pore may account for some of the above observations (37)(38)(39)(40). Factors that increase the release probability would modify the gating properties of presynaptic fusion pores from the nonexpanding mode to a rapidly expanding one in the same way as recently suggested for LTP at silent synapses (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The percentage of such events that did not lead to full fusion was 11.6% for 140 NaCl, 8.9% for 90 NaCl, 7% for 40 NaCl and 6.8% for 0 NaCl. These frequencies are similar to those previously reported 17 . The mean amperometric current amplitudes of these events showed a similar decrease with decreasing [NaCl] from 4.9 +/− 0.4 pA (n=33) in 140 NaCl solution to 2.1+/−0.2 pA (n=31) in 0 NaCl solution.…”
Section: Flux Of Catecholamines Through the Fusion Pore Depends On Exsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Early fusion pores may fluctuate, producing flickering amperometric foot currents in recordings from mast cells (Alvarez de Toledo et al, 1993) and chromaffin cells (Zhou et al, 1996), which reflect fluctuations in transmitter release due to fluctuations in fusion pore conductance (Albillos et al, 1997;Gong et al, 2007). The fusion pore conductance measurements showed three types of fusion pore expansion modes (Fig.…”
Section: Early Fusion Pore Conductance and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%