2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid flow separation for transient inflow conditions versus accelerating bodies: An investigation into their equivalency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, vortex formation in trailing edge appears as a longer vortex sheet for accelerated flows, which increases the lift . It is also worthy to mention that differences in aerodynamic loads in pre stall or post stall conditions for different accelerations are also influenced by non‐circulatory (added mass) term . The non‐circulatory term is the same term in Theodorsen instability theorem, in which the lift is summation of circulatory and non‐circulatory forces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, vortex formation in trailing edge appears as a longer vortex sheet for accelerated flows, which increases the lift . It is also worthy to mention that differences in aerodynamic loads in pre stall or post stall conditions for different accelerations are also influenced by non‐circulatory (added mass) term . The non‐circulatory term is the same term in Theodorsen instability theorem, in which the lift is summation of circulatory and non‐circulatory forces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach that has been chosen to represent the time variation of the angle of attack is somehow controversial, since it does not reproduce standard wind tunnel experiments where the aerofoil is rotated around a revolution axis (usually the line through the centre of pressure of the aerofoil). However, the two approaches lead to similar results in terms of integral quantities, with some discrepancy in the shape and evolution of the wake (see Wong et al 32 ). Finally, the remaining boundary conditions are imposed by enforcing: impermeability and no slip conditions on the aerofoil wall, periodic conditions on the planes bounding the domain in the spanwise direction, and continuity of the flow variables through the top and bottom planes generated by the C-grid shape downstream of the trailing edge.…”
Section: Mathematical and Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that recent studies have indicated that oscillation of the body instead of the oscillation of the freestream are not equivalent even at low frequencies. For the steady incident velocity, a uniform freestream ( U = U ∞ ) is considered, and for the unsteady freestream velocity, U ∞ = U mean . Both SOS and COS have the same frequency of oscillation, f , with the same reduced frequency ( k ), where kMathClass-rel=πitalicfcUMathClass-rel∞MathClass-punc.…”
Section: Simulated Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%