2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.12.20230326
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid feedback on hospital onset SARS-CoV-2 infections combining epidemiological and sequencing data

Abstract: BackgroundRapid identification and investigation of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) is important for suppression of SARS-CoV-2, but the infection source for hospital onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs) cannot always be readily identified based only on epidemiological data. Viral sequencing data provides additional information regarding potential transmission clusters, but the low mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 can make interpretation using standard phylogenetic methods difficult.MethodsWe developed a novel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals infected with identical or near-identical (≤1 SNP) viruses, are more likely to be linked in a transmission chain than those with more distantly related viruses, as demonstrated by previous retrospective studies that have utilised WGS to identify nosocomial infections and outbreaks. [7][8][9][10][11][12] We investigated whether sequencing could enhance epidemiological investigation of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 acquisition in two areas: i) confirming/excluding nosocomial acquisition and ii) understanding the role of outbreaks in nosocomial acquisition. We highlight the benefits and pitfalls of this approach, to help guide local practice in individual centres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals infected with identical or near-identical (≤1 SNP) viruses, are more likely to be linked in a transmission chain than those with more distantly related viruses, as demonstrated by previous retrospective studies that have utilised WGS to identify nosocomial infections and outbreaks. [7][8][9][10][11][12] We investigated whether sequencing could enhance epidemiological investigation of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 acquisition in two areas: i) confirming/excluding nosocomial acquisition and ii) understanding the role of outbreaks in nosocomial acquisition. We highlight the benefits and pitfalls of this approach, to help guide local practice in individual centres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied a novel algorithm, the Sequence Reporting Tool (SRT) to estimate the probability of healthcare- vs community-acquired infection in each case, based on the statistical approach developed for the COG-UK hospital-onset COVID-19 infection (HOCI) study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04405934). 22 The approach is based on Bayesian principles and involves comparison of the proportion of similar viral sequences (with maximum pairwise SNP difference of two, with no difference where there is an overlap in ambiguous nucleotide codes or an ‘N’ in either sequence) observed within potential locations of infection for the case of interest: i) patients’ RDU and elsewhere in this hospital, ii) inpatient ward and hospital (if the patient was admitted) all within the prior three weeks; along with a weighted proportion of similar sequences in the local community of the patient within the prior six weeks based on the outer postcode of their home address. There are 61 districts based on this outcode (49 in Glasgow and 12 in Lanarkshire).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRT algorithm was coded in R version 3.6.0, using the ape v5.3 package for calculation of pairwise SNP differences and PostcodesioR v0.1.1 and gmt v2.0-1 packages to calculate distances between postcodes. 22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using an overdispersion parameter of 0.82 based on retrospective analysis of data from Sheffield and Glasgow (dataset as described by Stirrup et al) results in 81% power to detect a reduction in mean weekly incidence from 12.5 to 10. 6…”
Section: Sample Size and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%