Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
Abstract:Background
People who inject drugs are at increased health risk in a pandemic due to their greater susceptibility to severe disease and as a consequence of the restrictions put in place to halt the spread of infection. Harm reduction (HR) services, which aim to reduce the negative effects of drug use on health, are likely to be diminished in a pandemic. However, innovative HR interventions and messaging may also develop in response to such a crisis. It is vital to understand the most effective ways to deliver … Show more
“…The pandemic provided opportunities for more focused partnership and coordinated working in the city centre, and enhanced and immediate communication across the sector, where competition between organisations was previously commonplace. This aligns with guidance on meeting the needs of people with multiple and complex needs, including with drug and alcohol problems [ 6 ], and specific COVID-19 guidance on strengthening partnerships between harm reduction and wider services such as housing and pharmacy providers [ 46 ]. These responses were not put in place without challenge, but those advocating for the immediate need for reduced administrative barriers were successful in persuading senior leaders in a range of organisations to adapt and allow change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The increased likelihood of substance-related harm, and death, that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought to an existing crisis of substance harms has been referred to as a dual public health emergency, with immediate action being called for to prevent the spread of infection amongst an often immune-compromised population [ 44 ]. It is essential that services are maintained and, where necessary, altered to meet the differing needs of people who use substances in response to the pandemic, and that funding for such services is safeguarded [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, this has included changes to drugs harm reduction services, including: designating harm reduction services to be essential [ 46 ]; developing emergency harm reduction plans [ 46 ]; access to COVID-19 screening and testing [ 47 ]; changes to service and medication provision to comply with pandemic guidance [ 41 , 42 , 46 – 56 ]; improved access to naloxone and IEP [ 47 , 50 ]; increased awareness of the need for clean water for injecting [ 57 ]; general guidance about reducing COVID-19 spread in services [ 58 – 60 ]; the need for a ‘safe supply’ of drugs [ 46 ]; and the need for holistic models of care that attend to mental and physical health and housing needs [ 46 ]. While evidence is still emerging on how the pandemic impacted drugs harm reduction, strict lockdown rules have appeared to reduce the number of people accessing IEP and other harm reduction services [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated unprecedented changes in the way that health, social, and housing services are delivered to individuals experiencing homelessness and problem substance use. Protecting those at high risk of infection/transmission, whilst addressing the multiple health and social needs of this group, is of utmost importance. This study aimed to document the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals who were experiencing homelessness in one city centre in Scotland, and how services adapted in response.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals with lived/living experience of homelessness (n = 10), staff within onethird sector service (n = 5), and external professionals (n = 5), during April-August 2020, using a rapid case study design. These were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, and analysed using Framework. Analysis was informed by inclusion health and equity-orientated approaches to meeting the needs of people with multiple and complex needs, and emerging literature on providing harm reduction in the context of COVID-19.
Results
Those with lived/living experience of homelessness and problem substance use faced a range of additional challenges during the pandemic. Mental health and use of substances were affected, influenced by social isolation and access to services. A range of supports were provided which flexed over the lockdown period, including housing, health and social care, substance use treatment, and harm reduction. As well as documenting the additional risks encountered, findings describe COVID-19 as a ‘path-breaking’ event that created opportunities to get evidence into action, increase partnership working and communication, to proactively address risks.
Conclusions
This rapid case study has described the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a group of people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use within one city centre in Scotland and provides a unique lens on service/professional responses. It concludes with lessons that can inform the international and ongoing response to this pandemic. It is vital to recognise the vision and leadership that has adapted organisational responses in order to reduce harms. We must learn from such successes that were motivated both by compassion and care for those vulnerable to harms and the desire to provide high-quality, evidence-based, harm reduction services.
“…The pandemic provided opportunities for more focused partnership and coordinated working in the city centre, and enhanced and immediate communication across the sector, where competition between organisations was previously commonplace. This aligns with guidance on meeting the needs of people with multiple and complex needs, including with drug and alcohol problems [ 6 ], and specific COVID-19 guidance on strengthening partnerships between harm reduction and wider services such as housing and pharmacy providers [ 46 ]. These responses were not put in place without challenge, but those advocating for the immediate need for reduced administrative barriers were successful in persuading senior leaders in a range of organisations to adapt and allow change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The increased likelihood of substance-related harm, and death, that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought to an existing crisis of substance harms has been referred to as a dual public health emergency, with immediate action being called for to prevent the spread of infection amongst an often immune-compromised population [ 44 ]. It is essential that services are maintained and, where necessary, altered to meet the differing needs of people who use substances in response to the pandemic, and that funding for such services is safeguarded [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, this has included changes to drugs harm reduction services, including: designating harm reduction services to be essential [ 46 ]; developing emergency harm reduction plans [ 46 ]; access to COVID-19 screening and testing [ 47 ]; changes to service and medication provision to comply with pandemic guidance [ 41 , 42 , 46 – 56 ]; improved access to naloxone and IEP [ 47 , 50 ]; increased awareness of the need for clean water for injecting [ 57 ]; general guidance about reducing COVID-19 spread in services [ 58 – 60 ]; the need for a ‘safe supply’ of drugs [ 46 ]; and the need for holistic models of care that attend to mental and physical health and housing needs [ 46 ]. While evidence is still emerging on how the pandemic impacted drugs harm reduction, strict lockdown rules have appeared to reduce the number of people accessing IEP and other harm reduction services [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated unprecedented changes in the way that health, social, and housing services are delivered to individuals experiencing homelessness and problem substance use. Protecting those at high risk of infection/transmission, whilst addressing the multiple health and social needs of this group, is of utmost importance. This study aimed to document the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals who were experiencing homelessness in one city centre in Scotland, and how services adapted in response.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals with lived/living experience of homelessness (n = 10), staff within onethird sector service (n = 5), and external professionals (n = 5), during April-August 2020, using a rapid case study design. These were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, and analysed using Framework. Analysis was informed by inclusion health and equity-orientated approaches to meeting the needs of people with multiple and complex needs, and emerging literature on providing harm reduction in the context of COVID-19.
Results
Those with lived/living experience of homelessness and problem substance use faced a range of additional challenges during the pandemic. Mental health and use of substances were affected, influenced by social isolation and access to services. A range of supports were provided which flexed over the lockdown period, including housing, health and social care, substance use treatment, and harm reduction. As well as documenting the additional risks encountered, findings describe COVID-19 as a ‘path-breaking’ event that created opportunities to get evidence into action, increase partnership working and communication, to proactively address risks.
Conclusions
This rapid case study has described the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a group of people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use within one city centre in Scotland and provides a unique lens on service/professional responses. It concludes with lessons that can inform the international and ongoing response to this pandemic. It is vital to recognise the vision and leadership that has adapted organisational responses in order to reduce harms. We must learn from such successes that were motivated both by compassion and care for those vulnerable to harms and the desire to provide high-quality, evidence-based, harm reduction services.
“…Comprehensive assessment protocols were developed for people with OUD when they were treated in hospital for COVID-19 and efforts were made to provide and continue OUD treatment for them [ 5 , 19 ]. Maintaining the provision of needle and syringe programs is highlighted by several authors [ 20 ▪ , 21 , 22 ]. Mail-based needle and syringe distribution services, home delivery and vending machine were suggested as these measures provide increased accessibility for patients, no-contact service, and around-the-clock convenience [ 13 ▪▪ , 20 ▪ , 22 ].…”
Section: Responses and Strategies To Maintain Opioid Treatment Programs During The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have emphasized the importance of emergency treatment for overdoses and expanding naloxone access as the number of opioid overdoses could rise sharply [ 12 , 20 ▪ , 23 ]. Delivery of naloxone kits by mail, increased street-based outreach, and distributing take-home naloxone in public areas were adopted [ 12 ].…”
Section: Responses and Strategies To Maintain Opioid Treatment Programs During The Pandemicmentioning
Purpose of review
The current article reviews the impact of the biggest health crisis for many decades, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on opioid treatment programs and the strategies adopted for maintaining opioid treatment programs during the pandemic.
Recent findings
The difficulty of access to opioid treatment services and the mental health problems accompanying opioid use disorders are the two main challenges to maintaining accessible and effective opioid treatment. Many countries and institutions issued guidance and recommendations to address these challenges. General coping strategies, loosening of policies, telemedicine, and depot buprenorphine are four main strategies to cope with the challenges posed by the pandemic.
Summary
There were considerable obstacles to maintaining opioid intervention programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies addressing the obstacles are identified. Research in this area needs to be strengthened.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.