2020
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid early development and feeding benefits an invasive population of lake trout

Abstract: Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) were discovered in Yellowstone Lake in 1994 and their population expanded dramatically despite intensive suppression. The lake is species-depauperate, with no major lake trout embryo predators. We hypothesized that without this predation threat, lake trout free embryo feeding and growth may be greater than in their native range, leading to increased survival of age-0 individuals and rapid population growth. We compared length, developmental rate, and feeding patterns of lake t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lake Trout in Yellowstone Lake spawn earlier than other invasive (Dux et al 2011;Siemiantkowski et al 2022) and native (Marsden et al 2005) populations at similar latitudes, and water temperatures at most known Yellowstone Lake spawning areas could facilitate hatching (Koel et al 2020a), emergence, and potentially dispersal months earlier than these events would occur within the native range of the species (Krueger and Ihssen 1995;Ladago et al 2016). Yellowstone Lake fry contained more food, dispersed later, and achieved a greater maximum length before dispersal than did fry in Lake Champlain, Vermont, within the Lake Trout's native range (Simard et al 2020). Dispersal from the Carrington Island spawning reef before mid-summer in any year was therefore unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Lake Trout in Yellowstone Lake spawn earlier than other invasive (Dux et al 2011;Siemiantkowski et al 2022) and native (Marsden et al 2005) populations at similar latitudes, and water temperatures at most known Yellowstone Lake spawning areas could facilitate hatching (Koel et al 2020a), emergence, and potentially dispersal months earlier than these events would occur within the native range of the species (Krueger and Ihssen 1995;Ladago et al 2016). Yellowstone Lake fry contained more food, dispersed later, and achieved a greater maximum length before dispersal than did fry in Lake Champlain, Vermont, within the Lake Trout's native range (Simard et al 2020). Dispersal from the Carrington Island spawning reef before mid-summer in any year was therefore unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to Simard et al. (2020), early life stages of Lake Trout in Yellowstone Lake benefit from the depauperate fish community in the lake, which allows them to more freely take advantage of available food resources in the lake and which presumably leads to better survival than in most other systems in the species’ native range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, we attribute this increase to an increase in prerecruitment survival-perhaps attributable to a reduction in recruitment compensation caused possibly by factors such as reduction in cannibalism of new recruits by older fish (Syslo et al 2020). According to Simard et al (2020), early life stages of Lake Trout in Yellowstone Lake benefit from the depauperate fish community in the lake, which allows them to more freely take advantage of available food resources in the lake and which presumably leads to better survival than in most other systems in the species' native range.…”
Section: Lake Trout Reproduction In Yellowstone Lakementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Implementation of effective embryo suppression methods would complement traditional gillnetting techniques in an integrated pest management approach and would hasten Lake Trout population decline (Sawyer 1980; Christie and Goddard 2003; Lechelt and Bajer 2016; Brown et al 2017; Thomas et al 2019). Embryo suppression may be particularly important in Yellowstone Lake, where Lake Trout embryo feeding and growth are greater (Simard et al 2020) and prerecruit survival is four to six times higher than those of Lake Trout populations within their native range (Syslo et al 2020). Furthermore, Lake Trout population growth rates are highly sensitive to age‐0 survival rates (Ferreri et al 1995; Syslo et al 2011; Cox et al 2013); hence, successful embryo suppression could have population‐level effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%