1995
DOI: 10.1080/15428119591016197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Determination of Metal Particles on Air Sampling Filters Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 For particles, limits of detection for Be and Tl particles on filters were on the order of 0.45 and 40 ng/cm 2 , respectively, using an EO-laser and the long laser spark. 36,37 The results obtained here with the AO-laser agree favorably with the limits of detection obtained in these prior studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…11 For particles, limits of detection for Be and Tl particles on filters were on the order of 0.45 and 40 ng/cm 2 , respectively, using an EO-laser and the long laser spark. 36,37 The results obtained here with the AO-laser agree favorably with the limits of detection obtained in these prior studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We intentionally used a lower energy laser in this study, much lower than those used in most traditional LIBS studies of aerosols (Arnold and Cremers 1995;Cheng 2000;Park et al 2009), so as to mimic performance of low-power miniature lasers used in field-portable LIBS instruments. In traditional LIBS studies on aerosols, the laser pulse energy is generally in the range of 100-300 mJ/pulse, whereas in the field-portable instruments it is typically in the range of 25-50 mJ/pulse (Panne et al 2001;Pierce et al 2004;Goujon et al 2008).…”
Section: Laser-needle Orientation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One option, to preserve this information, is to use LIBS for rapid quantitative analysis of particulates collected on filters. Arnold and Cremers 43 have reported on the determination of thalium on fil-ters in less than 1 minute with a limit of detection of 40 ng/cm 2 • While not a real-time measurement, this approach significantly shortens the analysis time for samples collected in this way. Panne et al have used an automated approach where a continuous filter belt conveys the collected particulate to a portable LIES instrument (Nd:YAG, 1064 nm, 30 rn]/pulse) for near on-line analysis in a municipal waste incinerator.…”
Section: Applications To Particle Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%