2003
DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0380:rdosfp]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Detection of Salmonella from Poultry by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction with Fluorescent Hybridization Probes

Abstract: Detection of Salmonella by bacteriologic methods is known to be time consuming. Therefore, we have developed a real-time probe-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to rapidly detect Salmonella invA gene-based PCR products from chicken feces and carcasses by a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay. The sensitivity and the specificity of this system were determined as 3 colony-forming units ml(-1) and 100%, respectively. Overnight tetrathionate broth enrichment cultures of chicken feces and carcass sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
21
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with results of this work, PCR can represent an alternative to costly and time consuming culture methods for the detection of pathogenic Salmonella species in a sample (11)(12)(13). In addition, pre-screening Objetivos.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Consistent with results of this work, PCR can represent an alternative to costly and time consuming culture methods for the detection of pathogenic Salmonella species in a sample (11)(12)(13). In addition, pre-screening Objetivos.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Previous studies have used molecular techniques to identify pathogens and/or genes directly from samples. These methods have proven to be reliable, cost-effective, user friendly, sensitive and specific as well as providing a distinct advantage in regards to time saving over conventional culture methods (Blessmann et al, 2002;Eyigor and Carli, 2003;Garofalo et al, 2007;McOrist et al, 2002).…”
Section: Chapter 1: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For human stool samples, the extraction using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) yielded statistically greater PCR sensitivity in comparison to the Chelex methods (Cordova et al, 2010) Overall, molecular methods to detect pathogens or VGs directly from faeces have proven to be reliable, cost-effective, user friendly and accurate in other animal species, therefore, providing a distinct advantage over conventional methods (Blessmann et al, 2002;Eyigor and Carli, 2003;Garofalo et al, 2007;Gioffre et al, 2004;McOrist et al, 2002). However, currently, there is a lack of information pertaining to the quality and quantity of extracted DNA from chicken faecal samples using different DNA extraction methods (Barnard et al, 2011).…”
Section: (B) (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be potential in the future for improving detection and confirmation of Salmonella by the use of molecular methods such as PCR or microarray (Bailey, 1998;Eyigor and Carli, 2003;Fratamico, 2003) but these do not always perform reliably in all laboratories, especially in a faecal matrix, and such alternative methods have to be validated according to European EN/ISO 16140:2003 25 standards.…”
Section: Monitoring Systems In the Eumentioning
confidence: 99%