2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of P–35S and T-nos in genetically modified organisms by recombinase polymerase amplification combined with a lateral flow strip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Portable suitcase / 0.1% [32] DNAzyme-enhanced LFB 120 min 0.1% [33] RPA-based LFD / 50 and 100 copies [34] CPA-based anti-contamination test paper / / [35] More efficient high-throughput and convenient detection methods should be established in the future to promote and optimize large-scale screening in the field. Furthermore, the rapid pre-treatment of deep-processed foods containing GM ingredients in the market warrants investigation, while effective contamination prevention, visualization, and quantitative detection in the field are also significant and promising directions for future development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Portable suitcase / 0.1% [32] DNAzyme-enhanced LFB 120 min 0.1% [33] RPA-based LFD / 50 and 100 copies [34] CPA-based anti-contamination test paper / / [35] More efficient high-throughput and convenient detection methods should be established in the future to promote and optimize large-scale screening in the field. Furthermore, the rapid pre-treatment of deep-processed foods containing GM ingredients in the market warrants investigation, while effective contamination prevention, visualization, and quantitative detection in the field are also significant and promising directions for future development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the identification of P-35S and T-nos in GMOs, Liu et al established an RPA-based and lateral flow test paper (LFD)-based platform. Following the labeling of forward and reverse primers with various fluorescent groups at the 5 end, samples were quickly assessed for the presence of P-35S and T-nos genes of GMOs using the RPA-LFD technique at room temperature and, in the 9 GMO samples tested, the detection thresholds of RPA-LFD were found to be 50 and 100 copies [34]. Huang et al created a cross-primed isothermal amplification assay (CPA) for the rapid detection of the 35S promoter of the plant pathogen cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV 35S) in the field, which they combined with a biosensor made of anti-contamination test paper.…”
Section: On-site Detection Biosensor Based On Functional Nucleic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, RPA shows significant advantages, such as a short incubation time, lower incubation temperatures, and a high tolerance to sample impurities. It is possible to perform multiple RPA amplifications in one reaction system, and this has been successfully reported, for example, in a real-time fluorescent duplex RPA assay for the detection of Campylobacter coli and jejuni from eggs and chicken products [37], a duplex SRES-based lateral flow assay for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Enteritidis [1], and a duplex lateral flow assay for the detection of P-35S and T-nos in genetically modified organisms [38]. However, there have been few reports on the LFD-RPA assay for the simultaneous detection of three or more foodborne pathogens [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, RPA has been widely used for nucleic acid detection because of its high efficiency and easily achievable reaction temperature (37 -42 ℃) [15]. Recently, strategies such as RPA-AGE (RPA combined with agarose gel electrophoresis) [16], RT-RPA (real-time fluorescent RPA) [15,17], RPA-SYBR Green I (RPA combined with DNA fluorescent dye) [18,19], RPA-LFD (RPA combined with lateral flow immunochromatography) [20,21] and RPA-Cas12a-FS (RPA combined with Cas12a cutting) [22] have been established and implemented in the field of rapid detection. Among these methods, the test strip method is the most suitable for on-site testing for its full independence of testing equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%