2006
DOI: 10.1290/0505035.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Detection of Mycoplasma Contamination in Cell Cultures Using Sybr Green-Based Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Abstract: We have developed a simple method for rapid detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures using SYBR Green-based real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To detect eight common contaminant mollicutes, including Mycoplasma (M. arginini, M. fermentans, M. orale, M. hyorhinis, M. hominis, M. salivarium, M. pirum) and Acholeplasma laidlawii, four primers were prepared based on the 23S rRNA regions. Using these primers and a minimum of 100 fg of mycoplasma genomic DNA, the 23S rRNA regions of these eight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the reported ability of this mycoplasma testing procedure to efficiently detect all possible cell culture mycoplasmal contaminants, the overall testing procedure is time-consuming (a minimum of 28 days) and tedious and might not be suitable for biologics with shelf-lives that are shorter than the turnaround time for testing. In order to reduce the time required for mycoplasma testing, various approaches based on nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies targeting different genetic markers of Mollicutes have been developed and proposed as potential alternatives to the current methods (15,31,33,54,56,57,63). However, although PCR methods have definite advantages over conventional microbiological methods in terms of analytical sensitivity, simplicity, and turnaround time required for testing, it continues to be unclear whether PCR-based methods can provide a limit of detection comparable or superior to those of conventional methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the reported ability of this mycoplasma testing procedure to efficiently detect all possible cell culture mycoplasmal contaminants, the overall testing procedure is time-consuming (a minimum of 28 days) and tedious and might not be suitable for biologics with shelf-lives that are shorter than the turnaround time for testing. In order to reduce the time required for mycoplasma testing, various approaches based on nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies targeting different genetic markers of Mollicutes have been developed and proposed as potential alternatives to the current methods (15,31,33,54,56,57,63). However, although PCR methods have definite advantages over conventional microbiological methods in terms of analytical sensitivity, simplicity, and turnaround time required for testing, it continues to be unclear whether PCR-based methods can provide a limit of detection comparable or superior to those of conventional methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously shown [11][12][13][14], real-time PCR provides a highly sensitive and rapid technique for mycoplasma detection in cell culture or clinical samples. Based on the concept of a conventional PCR assay described in our previous study [ …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…More recently, a number of assays based on real-time PCR have been introduced [11][12][13][14]. Whereas Störmer et al [14] used conserved regions of the tuf gene for development of a broad-range PCR assay, most of the PCR assays target the 16S rDNA region.…”
Section: Design Of the Single-tube Real-time Pcr Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously shown [11,12,13,14], real-time PCR provides a highly sensitive and rapid technique for mycoplasma detection in cell culture or clinical samples. Based on the concept of a conventional PCR assay described in our previous study [3], we now present a single-tube real-time PCR assay with less hands-on time suitable for routine testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%