2010
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02474-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in Human Serum by Use of an Immunochromatographic Dipstick Test

Abstract: We evaluated a commercially available immunochromatographic dipstick test to detect Trypanosoma cruzi infection in 366 human serum samples with known serological results from Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico, and Venezuela. One hundred forty-nine of 366 (40.7%) and 171/366 (46.7%) samples tested positive by dipstick and serology, respectively. Dipstick sensitivity was calculated to be 84.8% (range between countries, 77.5 to 95%), and specificity was 97.9% (95.9 to 100%).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
30
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance data for the Trypanosoma Detect Rapid test (93.5% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity) are close to the data reported in 2010 by Reithinger et al (38) and in other similar studies (39). The SD-Bioline Chagas Ab Rapid test and the OnSite Chagas Ab Rapid testcassette results in serum were low compared to those reported in 2009 (40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The performance data for the Trypanosoma Detect Rapid test (93.5% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity) are close to the data reported in 2010 by Reithinger et al (38) and in other similar studies (39). The SD-Bioline Chagas Ab Rapid test and the OnSite Chagas Ab Rapid testcassette results in serum were low compared to those reported in 2009 (40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These screening tests are quickly performed, but they have not been validated at large scale and need confirmation with standard serological tests [15], [16].…”
Section: Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that many of them emerged from independent screenings carried out in different laboratories further supported their diagnostic potential but, unfortunately also led to a confusing nomenclature that still persist (Table 1) (reviewed in (da Silveira, Umezawa and Luquetti, 2001; Frasch et al, 1991)). Some of the antigens included in the T. cruzi 'parental repertoire' were extensively validated, in certain cases by way of multicenter trials (Caballero et al, 2007; Reithinger et al, 2010), and set the stage for the development of second-generation Chagas disease diagnostic methods. A variety of antigen expression procedures (i.e.…”
Section: Diagnostic Applications For Chagas D Isease: Present Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may be either qualitative or semi-quantitative and are characterized by the delivery of quick results, in most cases without the need for electrical equipment. In the case of Chagas disease, several LFIAs based on antigenic fractions or recombinant antigens and a single PoC test aimed at the capture and concentration of T. cruzi TESA antigens in urine samples (Chunap, see above) were developed (Table 1) (Castro-Sesquen et al, 2014; Houghton et al, 2009; Reithinger et al, 2010). Serological tests, however show substantial variations in their sensitivity in different geographical areas (Verani et al, 2009), and display sub-optimal performances (Sanchez-Camargo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Diagnostic Applications For Chagas D Isease: Pending Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%