2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of Gram-negative bacteria and their drug resistance genes from positive blood cultures using an automated microarray assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a disadvantage is not the case with methods such as mass spectrometry-based identification direct from blood culture broth. Also, failure to detect some mixed infections is a known limitation of the BC-GN assay that was consistent with our findings (19,24). The discordance seen in the case in which BC-GN was negative for panel targets but conventional methods identified K. pneumoniae could possibly have been Klebsiella variicola, a species that the BC-GN panel does not recognize but that is identified as K. pneumoniae with conventional biochemical identification (17,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a disadvantage is not the case with methods such as mass spectrometry-based identification direct from blood culture broth. Also, failure to detect some mixed infections is a known limitation of the BC-GN assay that was consistent with our findings (19,24). The discordance seen in the case in which BC-GN was negative for panel targets but conventional methods identified K. pneumoniae could possibly have been Klebsiella variicola, a species that the BC-GN panel does not recognize but that is identified as K. pneumoniae with conventional biochemical identification (17,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On a practical level, it required ϳ3.5 h from the time of Gram stain on the positive blood culture broth to entry of BC-GN results into electronic medical records. This is longer than the 2 to 2.5 h cited in most studies because we included samples that had delayed turnaround times due to gaps in laboratory coverage (9,18,19). During the implementation of the assay at our institution, providers were notified of the assay and its interpretation via laboratory bulletin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two studies have published theoretical applications of using BC‐GN testing in combination with local antibiograms to encourage less use of broad‐spectrum gram‐negative antibiotics . Other studies have shown decreased time to targeted antimicrobial therapy, but these did not include specific data on antibiotic utilization . A study conducted in Japan examining the impact of the gram‐negative and gram‐positive panels for community‐onset bacteremia reported a “common pattern” of de‐escalation among 12 patients with gram‐negative bacteremia from AP to non‐AP antibiotics (10 episodes of E. coli and 2 episodes of K. pneumoniae ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Other studies have shown decreased time to targeted antimicrobial therapy, but these did not include specific data on antibiotic utilization. 2,6,13 A study conducted in Japan examining the impact of the gram-negative and gram-positive panels for community-onset bacteremia reported a "common pattern" of de-escalation among 12 patients with gram-negative bacteremia from AP to non-AP antibiotics (10 episodes of E. coli and 2 episodes of K. pneumoniae). 14 The value of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for bacteremia was assessed in a study conducted at Mayo Clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%