2016
DOI: 10.1145/2980179.2980239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid, detail-preserving image downscaling

Abstract: Kopf et al. [2013]Ö ztireli and Gross [2015] DPID λ=1.0 DPID λ=0.5 Figure 1: Row 1: Input images with 0.5, 1.9, 2.7, and 4.6 megapixels respectively. Rows 2-5: Downscaled results with 128 pixels width. Our algorithm (DPID) preserves stars in Example 1, thin lines in Example 2, roof tiles in Example 3, and text, lines and notes in Example 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section reports the quantitative and qualitative performance of different image downscaling methods for SR. Then ablation studies of the proposed CAR model is conducted. We compare the CAR model with four baseline methods, i.e., the bicubic downscaling (Bicubic), and other three state-of-the-art image downscaling methods: perceptually optimized image downscaling (Perceptually) [15], detail-preserving image downscaling (DPID) [17], and L0-regularized image downscaling (L0-regularized) [19]. We train SR models using LR images downscaled by those four baseline downscaling algorithms and LR images downscaled by the proposed CAR model.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Downscaling Methods For Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section reports the quantitative and qualitative performance of different image downscaling methods for SR. Then ablation studies of the proposed CAR model is conducted. We compare the CAR model with four baseline methods, i.e., the bicubic downscaling (Bicubic), and other three state-of-the-art image downscaling methods: perceptually optimized image downscaling (Perceptually) [15], detail-preserving image downscaling (DPID) [17], and L0-regularized image downscaling (L0-regularized) [19]. We train SR models using LR images downscaled by those four baseline downscaling algorithms and LR images downscaled by the proposed CAR model.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Downscaling Methods For Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt similar evaluation settings used in [14,15,17,19]. The user study are conducted as the A/B testing: the original image is presented in the middle place with two variants (SR images or downscaled images) showed in either side, among which one is produced by the CAR method and another is generated by one of the competing methods, i.e., Bicubic, Perceptually [15], DPID [17] and L0-regularized [19]. The users are required to ask the question 'which one looks better' by exclusively selecting one of the three options from: 1) A is better than B; 2) A equals to B; 3) B is better than A.…”
Section: User Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we focus on downscaling inside the network and propose a pooling layer that is trainable, fully differentiable, and includes major pooling techniques as special (limit) Figure 2. Diagram of detail-preserving downscaling (DPID) [31] and our detail-preserving pooling (DPP). DPP omits the Gaussian filter; Full-DPP replaces the box filter with a learned 2D filter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cases. Moreover, we build on a detail-preserving image downscaling approach [31] that outperforms conventional image downscaling techniques in subjective testing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation