2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbsr.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid design and fielding of four diagnostic technologies in Sierra Leone, Thailand, Peru, and Australia: Successes and challenges faced introducing these biosensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the assay and material tested, at least one malaria marker was detected in 36–61 % of the tested samples (Table 1 ). These results were in line with previous reports of malaria positivity among febrile individuals in this location as detected by PCR-based methods [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Depending on the assay and material tested, at least one malaria marker was detected in 36–61 % of the tested samples (Table 1 ). These results were in line with previous reports of malaria positivity among febrile individuals in this location as detected by PCR-based methods [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These sites were selected for their high dengue endemicity. Iquitos City (population ~470,000) [12, 23] located in the Peruvian Amazon rainforest, is geographically isolated and only accessible by plane or boat, and has been the site of several studies, primarily on dengue epidemiology, since 1999 by the University of California at Davis/U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit Six-Iquitos group (NAMRU-6) [17, 18, 2428].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012, the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency Joint Science and Technology Office initiated a program to develop novel multiplex point-of-need (PON) diagnostics for surveillance of emerging infectious diseases. The first generation devices evaluated included ones that tested for dengue, malaria, plague, and melioidosis, integrated with a platform to automatically upload test results to a cloud-based biosurveillance system [12]. Evaluation in endemic countries was initiated in 2014 in sites in Thailand, Australia, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, and Peru to assess the use of these RDTs as close to the point-of-need as possible, including home-based testing by residents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two prototype devices used in the observation study were under evaluation by DTRA [ 20 ], whose long-term goals were to develop multiplex devices to detect a wide array of pathogens including Biological Safety Level III/IV agents that could be applied directly by community members. Neither device was developed further, but the DTRA-funded observation studies were for these devices, which provided us a model system to test devices of varied complexity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%