2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid decline in carbon monoxide emissions and export from East Asia between years 2005 and 2016

Abstract: Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) satellite and ground-based carbon monoxide (CO) measurements both suggest a widespread downward trend in CO concentrations over East Asia during the period 2005-2016. This negative trend is inconsistent with global bottom-up inventories of CO emissions, which show a small increase or stable emissions in this region. We try to reconcile the observed CO trend with emission inventories using an atmospheric inversion of the MOPITT CO data that estimates emissio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
96
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
10
96
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering larger scales, their distribution is similar, while for smaller scales, the distribution is different because the life cycle of NO 2 and SO 2 is indeed much shorter than CO. However, the vertical column densities of CO show a clear interannual downward trend ( Figure 5(d)) [50,51], which is different from the trends of NO 2 and SO 2 . During the first phase (2005-2011), CO decreased at an average rate of (0.03 ± 0.03) × 10 18 molec·cm − 2 ·yr − 1 , and during the second phase (2012-2016), it decreased faster, with an average rate of (0.05 ± 0.05) × 10 18 molec·cm − 2 ·yr − 1 .…”
Section: Interannual Summer Variation and Trends Of Relevantmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Considering larger scales, their distribution is similar, while for smaller scales, the distribution is different because the life cycle of NO 2 and SO 2 is indeed much shorter than CO. However, the vertical column densities of CO show a clear interannual downward trend ( Figure 5(d)) [50,51], which is different from the trends of NO 2 and SO 2 . During the first phase (2005-2011), CO decreased at an average rate of (0.03 ± 0.03) × 10 18 molec·cm − 2 ·yr − 1 , and during the second phase (2012-2016), it decreased faster, with an average rate of (0.05 ± 0.05) × 10 18 molec·cm − 2 ·yr − 1 .…”
Section: Interannual Summer Variation and Trends Of Relevantmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the emissions ratios expected from the inventory are higher than what we see in the ∆CO/∆CO 2 ratio distributions, with power generation the only category with an expected ratio below 1% CO/CO 2 , and the residential emissions above 11% CO/CO 2 . Recent work on pollution trends in East Asia by Zheng et al () indicate that CO emissions have decreased in China while fossil fuel consumption has held steady or increased and attribute this decrease in CO to increasing emission controls within China. Assessing the change in Chinese emissions is beyond the scope of the current work, but motivates the use of this technique as a method for assessing inventory comparisons to top‐down measurements, especially in areas like China where there are rapidly changing emissions characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, vehicle combustion efficiency has increased with time as compliance with emissions standards has improved (Popa et al, 2014;Singer & Harley, 1996), but standards vary between countries (Huo et al, 2011). South Korea has generally had stronger vehicle emissions standards than China (Wang et al, 2014), although combustion efficiency has been increasing in China with improved emissions control technology and government incentivized implementation of improved standards (Zhang et al, 2009;Zheng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The a priori emissions of fires are derived from GFED 4.1 s, and the other input data are summarized in Figure S1 and Table S1 (Olivier et al, 2003;Granier et al, 2011;Sindelarova et al, 2014;González Abad et al, 2015). Detail of the current version of the inversion system is given by Zheng et al (2018). Here we provide a brief summary.…”
Section: Inversion Analysis Of Co Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%