“…Electron microprobe analysis using wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometers (WDS) was thus selected as the method of choice for characterizing geological specimens and analysing large numbers of archaeological artefacts since only a tiny 1-2 mm sample is needed, sample preparation is minimal, analytical precision is superior to laser ablation ICP-MS, and the per-sample cost is a fraction of the price of XRF or NAA. The microprobe (or scanning electron microscope) with energy dispersive spectrometers (EDS) has been used for obsidian studies in Europe (Biró & Pozsgai, 1984;Biró, Pozsgai & Vlader, 1986), the Near East (Keller & Seifried, 1990), and East Africa (Merrick & Brown, 1984;Merrick, Brown & Nash, 1994), but it must be noted that, for most obsidians, TiO 2 , MgO, MnO, P 2 O 5 , and BaO are usually below the minimum detection limits of SEM or microprobe EDS systems. Since TiO 2 , MgO, and BaO are important for discriminating among the Mediterranean obsidian sources, WDS is necessary for provenance studies in this region (see Verità et al, 1994 for a comparative study of EDS and WDS).…”