1992
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199207000-00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
879
0
18

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,745 publications
(899 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
879
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences were evaluated using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM 99), (SPM Web page, 2002, www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm99). Automated image coregistration (Woods et al, 1992) was used to align the 12 frames within each study (Mann et al, 1996b). The resulting summarized image was transformed into standard stereotaxic atlas space (Talairach and Tournoux, 1988).…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences were evaluated using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM 99), (SPM Web page, 2002, www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm99). Automated image coregistration (Woods et al, 1992) was used to align the 12 frames within each study (Mann et al, 1996b). The resulting summarized image was transformed into standard stereotaxic atlas space (Talairach and Tournoux, 1988).…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subject's images were realigned in 3D space using Wood's automated image registration (AIR) algorithm [Woods et al, 1992]. All subjects' data were then registered to one representative subject's brain and pooled.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images from each experiment were first registered with a motion correction algorithm (AIR 3.0) (Woods et al 1992), and the signal time series in each voxel was linearly detrended with the AFNI software package (Cox 1996). For each subject in each condition (TD and FT, amphetamine and placebo), an individual correlation map was generated by cross correlating the time course of the fMRI signal in each pixel with a Figure 1.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%