Rapid assessment of management options for promoting stock rebuilding in data‐poor species under climate change

Abstract

The development of species recovery plans requires considering likely outcomes of different management interventions, but the complicating effects of climate change are rarely evaluated. We examined how qualitative network models (QNMs) can be deployed to support decision making when data, time, and funding limitations restrict use of more demanding quantitative methods. We used QNMs to evaluate management interventions intended to promote the rebuilding of a collapsed stock of blue king crab (Paralithodes platypus) (BKC) around the Pribilof Islands (eastern Bering Sea) to determine how their potential efficacy may change under climate change. Based on stakeholder input and a literature review, we constructed a QNM that described the life cycle of BKC, key ecological interactions, potential climate-change impacts, relative interaction strengths, and uncertainty in terms of interaction strengths and link presence. We performed sensitivity analyses to identify key sources of prediction uncertainty. Under a scenario of no climate change, predicted increases in BKC were reliable only when stock enhancement was implemented in a BKC hatchery-program scenario. However, when climate change was accounted for, the intervention could not counteract its adverse impacts, which had an overall negative effect on BKC. The remaining management scenarios related to changes in fishing effort on BKC predators. For those scenarios, BKC outcomes were unreliable, but climate change further decreased the probability of observing recovery. Including information on relative interaction strengths increased the likelihood of predicting positive outcomes for BKC approximately 5-50% under the management scenarios. The largest gains in prediction precision will be made by reducing uncertainty associated with ecological interactions between adult BKC and red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus). Qualitative network models are useful options when data are limited, but they remain underutilized in conservation. Evaluación Rápida de las Opciones de Manejo para la Promoción de la Recuperación de Especies con Deficiencia de Datos bajo el Cambio ClimáticoResumen: El desarrollo de los planes de recuperación de especies requiere de la consideración de los resultados probables de las diferentes intervenciones de manejo, pero los efectos agravantes del cambio climático rara vez * Address correspondence to J. C. P. Reum, email jonathan.reum@noaa.gov Article impact statement: Climate change can alter predicted outcomes of management interventions and qualitative network models can identify risks in data-limited settings.

A Community-Level Approach to Species Conservation: A Case Study of Falco naumanni in Southern Italy

“…Using this approach, which sacrificed precision for generality and realism [35,36], we circumvented many of the uncertainties (e.g., observation error and variable functional responses) that impede quantitative models [37]. Recent applications of qualitative modelling to ecological and environmental systems are found in [38][39][40][41][42].…”

A NOAA Fisheries science perspective on the conditions during and after COVID-19: challenges, observations, and some possible solutions, or why the future is upon us

“…Capabilities and methods are already in place for situations that are or become data-poor (e.g. Cope and Punt 2009, Carruthers et al 2014, Chrysafi and Kuparinen 2015, Geromont and Butterworth 2015, even for full systems assessments (Smythe and Thompson 2015, Francis et al 2018, Reum et al 2020). While we conduct our assessments regularly, we do not do all assessments every year.…”

“…The approach could be used to evaluate any number of actions under shorter term scenarios, including operating conditions improving or worsening in 2021 or more or less data available in 2021, all in the COVID-19 context. There are comparable, extant, qualitative tools (e.g., conceptual modeling, qualitative network analysis, mental models; Smythe and Thompson 2015, Francis et al 2018, Reum et al 2020) that can similarly be used for full ecosystem assessments, with particular consideration of the potential ramifications of various tradeoffs during COVID-19 conditions.…”

Practical implementation of cumulative‐effects management of marine ecosystems in western North America

“…( 2016 ) used BBNs to assess the potential effects of conservation and management actions in and out of marine reserves off mainland Ecuador; Reum et al. ( 2020 ) used QNMs to evaluate management options for rebuilding the collapsed blue king crab fishery in the northeast Pacific; and Kontogianni et al. ( 2012 ) used FCMs to identify CE and weigh management options to enhance Black Sea ecosystem resilience in Ukraine.…”