2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Approaches for Assignment of the Relative Configuration in 1-Oxygenated 1,2-Diarylpropan-3-ols by 1H NMR Spectroscopy

Abstract: The structural elucidation of chiral molecules with more than one stereocenter is usually a tricky problem. In this paper, efficient 1H NMR spectroscopic approaches for assigning the erythro and threo configurations of 1-oxygenated 1,2-diarylpropan-3-ols were developed. By analysis of the chemical shift differences of diastereotopic methylene H2-3 (Δδ3) in CDCl3 or the chemical shift differences of H-1 and H-2 (Δδ1,2) in methanol-d 4, deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide, and acetone-d 6, the configurations of 1-oxyg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] The linkage position of 3'',5''-dimethoxyphenyl moiety at C-2 was . [9] The Δδ 1,2 value of 1 was about 2.19 ppm, which suggested that compound 1 has a erythro configuration. The absolute configuration of 1 was elucidated as 1S,2R by the experimental and calculated ECD spectra analysis (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8] The linkage position of 3'',5''-dimethoxyphenyl moiety at C-2 was . [9] The Δδ 1,2 value of 1 was about 2.19 ppm, which suggested that compound 1 has a erythro configuration. The absolute configuration of 1 was elucidated as 1S,2R by the experimental and calculated ECD spectra analysis (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The linkage position of 3′′,5′′‐dimethoxyphenyl moiety at C‐2 was also confirmed by the HMBC cross‐peaks from 3′′/5′′‐OCH 3 ( δ H 3.66) and H‐2′′/6′′ ( δ H 6.35) to C‐3′′/5′′ ( δ C 159.5) and from H‐2 ( δ H 2.94) to C‐1′′ ( δ C 142.5) and C‐3′′/5′′. The chemical shift differences of H‐1 and H‐2 (Δ δ 1,2 ) were applicable in distinguishing threo ‐ and erythro ‐1‐oxygenated 1,2‐diarylpropan‐3‐ols [ threo (Δ δ 1,2 <1.95 ppm) and erythro (Δ δ 1,2 >2.00 ppm) in DMSO‐ d 6 [9] . The Δ δ 1,2 value of 1 was about 2.19 ppm, which suggested that compound 1 has a erythro configuration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the data with the published articles, and considering their physical and spectroscopic data, it was determined that the known compounds are 4‐hydroxy‐4,7‐dimethyl‐1‐tetralone ( 2 ), [15] (−)‐loliolide ( 3 ), [16] limonin ( 4 ), [17] diosgenin ( 5 ), [18] guaiacylglycerol 8′‐vanillin ether ( 6 ), [19] coriarianeolignan A ( 7 ), [20] thero ‐2,3‐bis(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxyphenyl)‐3‐methoxypropanol ( 8 ), [21,22] 1,2‐bis(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxyphenyl)propane‐1,3‐diol ( 9 ), [23] evofolin B ( 10 ), [24] cleomiscosin B ( 11 ), [25] cleomiscosin A ( 12 ), [25] cleomiscosin C ( 13 ), [26] honokiol ( 14 ), [27] (−)‐guaiacylglycerol‐ β ‐ O‐ 4′‐coniferyl ether ( 15 ), [28] 1‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxyphenyl)‐2‐[3‐(3‐hydroxy‐1‐propen‐1‐yl)‐5‐methoxyphenoxy]‐1,3‐propanediol ( 16 ), [29] ficusal ( 17 ), [30] (−)‐jatrointelignan D ( 18 ), [31] (−)‐simulanol ( 19 ), [32] (+)‐dehydrodiconiferyl alcohol ( 20 ), [33] (+)‐medioresinol ( 21 ), [34–36] threo ‐ficusesquilignan A ( 22 ), [37] erythro ‐ficusesquilignan A ( 23 ), [32,34,37] hedyotisol A ( 24 ), [34,38] hedyotisol B ( 25 ), [32,39] naringenin ( 26 ), [40] oroxylin A ( 27 ), [41] kaempferol ( 28 ), [42] rutin ( 29 ), [43] hinokiflavone ( 30 ), [44] isofraxidin ( 31 ), [45] scopoletin ( 32 ), [46] N‐trans‐ feruloyltyramine ( 33 ), [47] and rutaecarpine ( 34 ) [48]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%