2021
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid antigen detection alone may not be sufficient for early diagnosis and/or mass screening of COVID‐19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples of COVID-19 patients is in the range of 10 3 to 10 9 copies per mL, 29 31 the multiplex RT-LAMP assay was sufficiently sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical situations. 32 To test whether the HFman-based pipeline improved the specificity of the multiplex RT-LAMP, we performed SYTO-9-based (non-specific DNA binding fluorescent dye) and HFman probe-based multiplex RT-LAMP reactions using RNase-free H 2 O (non-template control, NTC). Non-specific amplification (Tt values: 21.8–38.0) occurred in the RT-LAMP reaction with SYTO-9, but no amplification signal was observed in the reactions with HFman probes ( Figure 3 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples of COVID-19 patients is in the range of 10 3 to 10 9 copies per mL, 29 31 the multiplex RT-LAMP assay was sufficiently sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical situations. 32 To test whether the HFman-based pipeline improved the specificity of the multiplex RT-LAMP, we performed SYTO-9-based (non-specific DNA binding fluorescent dye) and HFman probe-based multiplex RT-LAMP reactions using RNase-free H 2 O (non-template control, NTC). Non-specific amplification (Tt values: 21.8–38.0) occurred in the RT-LAMP reaction with SYTO-9, but no amplification signal was observed in the reactions with HFman probes ( Figure 3 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a positive test for two different SARS-CoV-2 genes, the overall assay LOD was 115 copies per reaction. Given that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples of COVID-19 patients is in the range of 10 3 to 10 9 copies per mL, the multiplex RT-LAMP assay was sufficiently sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical situations . To test whether the HFman-based pipeline improved the specificity of the multiplex RT-LAMP, we performed SYTO-9-based (non-specific DNA binding fluorescent dye) and HFman probe-based multiplex RT-LAMP reactions using RNase-free H 2 O (non-template control, NTC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective mass screening based on antigen test detection of SARS-CoV-2 has been described 21 . But a recent review of several antigen tests on the market states that two-thirds had overall sensitivities (30.8%-68.9%) below the World Health Organization recommended standard of ≥ 80% raising concerns whether the antigen detection alone is sufficient for COVID-19 mass screening 22 . Combining our predictive model with an antigen test could be a promising mass screening strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the rapid antigen tests, these are also being widely adopted for preliminary screening, but they have substantially lower sensitivity than the WHO-recommended standard, especially for pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic cases [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%