2003
DOI: 10.3201/eid0911.030318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Antigen-Capture Assay To Detect West Nile Virus in Dead Corvids

Abstract: The utility of the VecTest antigen-capture assay to detect West Nile virus (WNV) in field-collected dead corvids was evaluated in Manitoba and Ontario, Canada, in 2001 and 2002. Swabs were taken from the oropharynx, cloaca, or both of 109 American Crows, 31 Blue Jays, 6 Common Ravens, and 4 Black-billed Magpies from Manitoba, and 255 American Crows and 28 Blue Jays from Ontario. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen-capture assay were greatest for samples from American Crows; oropharyngeal swabs were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
3
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, that the reporting drops off as the season progresses should not affect the results of this study as long as it is not associated with WNV status group. The third situation involves the sensitivity of VecTestH that has been measured at between 78.4% and 92.8%, which is less than ideal (Lindsay et al, 2003;Stone et al, 2004;Stone et al, 2005;Padgett et al, 2006). This weak sensitivity leads to a general underestimation of the number of positive carcasses.…”
Section: Limits Imposed By the Surveillance Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same way, that the reporting drops off as the season progresses should not affect the results of this study as long as it is not associated with WNV status group. The third situation involves the sensitivity of VecTestH that has been measured at between 78.4% and 92.8%, which is less than ideal (Lindsay et al, 2003;Stone et al, 2004;Stone et al, 2005;Padgett et al, 2006). This weak sensitivity leads to a general underestimation of the number of positive carcasses.…”
Section: Limits Imposed By the Surveillance Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test has been shown to have relatively good specificity (between 79% and 100%) and sensitivity (between 70.4% and 92.8%) (Lindsay et al, 2003;Stone et al, 2004Stone et al, , 2005Padgett et al, 2006).…”
Section: Sample Collection and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct diagnostic test (VecTest®, Medical Analysis Systems, Inc.) was performed on each carcass to determine its status for WNV. This WNV antigen detection test was chosen because of its specificity between 79% and 100% and sensitivity between 70.4% and 92.8% (Lindsay et al 2003;Stone et al 2004;Stone et al 2005;Padgett et al 2006).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supernatant fraction was clarified by centrifugation at 15,000 ϫ g for 15 min at 4°C before storage at Ϫ70°C. Cell pellets were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.7 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 6 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , pH 7.5) before lysis in RIPA buffer (50 (80) have shown that this dose of the virus produces an approximately 50% mortality rate in adult hamsters. This strain was originally isolated from the liver of a dead snowy owl at the Bronx Zoo (New York City) in the summer of 1999.…”
Section: Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WNV genome encodes a polyprotein that is co-and posttranslationally cleaved into 10 individual gene products: three structural proteins, C, prM, and E, and seven nonstructural proteins, NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5 (47). Antigen capture assays for the surface glycoprotein of the viral particle, the E protein, have been developed for WNV (35) and other flaviviruses (31,41,50,54,58,69,75). For detection of virus, these methods compare favorably with traditional methods of virus isolation in cell culture and suckling mice but are less sensitive than PCR-based methods of detection and do not remain positive after clearance of viremia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%