2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and strong de novo donor-specific antibody development in a lung transplant recipient: Short communication/case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of dnDSAs is a significant problem in contemporary solid organ transplantation. In our previous studies, using the HLAMatchmaker algorithm, we showed that the probability of kidney and liver recipients developing antibodies post‐transplantation correlates with the epitope load of MM antigens 25,40,41 . In this retrospective study, we analyzed the formation of dnDSAs in 220 LT recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of dnDSAs is a significant problem in contemporary solid organ transplantation. In our previous studies, using the HLAMatchmaker algorithm, we showed that the probability of kidney and liver recipients developing antibodies post‐transplantation correlates with the epitope load of MM antigens 25,40,41 . In this retrospective study, we analyzed the formation of dnDSAs in 220 LT recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous studies, using the HLA-Matchmaker algorithm, we showed that the probability of kidney and liver recipients developing antibodies post-transplantation correlates with the epitope load of MM antigens. 25,40,41 In this retrospective study, we analyzed the formation of dnDSAs in 220 LT recipients. The results of these studies indicate that HLAMatchmaker and PIRCHE-II in silico technologies can be equally used to assess the epitope load of mismatched HLAs, and the latter algorithm determines the Freedom from graft failure (%)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%