2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and slow: Varying magma ascent rates as a mechanism for Vulcanian explosions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
43
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the June batch caused the October 18 explosion, the averaged ascent rate over this period is ~3 m h -1 . This is consistent with tilt signal modelling (Neuberg et al, 2018) but it is at the low end (Cassidy et al, 2018) of effusive eruptions with intermittent explosive activity, such as at Soufrière Hills (Edmonds et al, 2003), Unzen (Hirabayashi et al, 1995), Mt St Helens (Gerlach and McGee, 1994), and Colima (Cassidy et al, 2015). This low ascent rate nevertheless gave rise to one of the most powerful recent event at…”
Section: Explosion Trigger and Eruptive Intensitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Assuming that the June batch caused the October 18 explosion, the averaged ascent rate over this period is ~3 m h -1 . This is consistent with tilt signal modelling (Neuberg et al, 2018) but it is at the low end (Cassidy et al, 2018) of effusive eruptions with intermittent explosive activity, such as at Soufrière Hills (Edmonds et al, 2003), Unzen (Hirabayashi et al, 1995), Mt St Helens (Gerlach and McGee, 1994), and Colima (Cassidy et al, 2015). This low ascent rate nevertheless gave rise to one of the most powerful recent event at…”
Section: Explosion Trigger and Eruptive Intensitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We infer that pressure changes related to vein opening triggered either fragmentation or vesiculation of neighboring magma, depending upon the rate and amount of decompression, and the porosity-controlled fragmentation threshold (Spieler et al, 2004). Magma porosity within the shallow conduit was heterogeneous over short spatial scales, resulting from the integrated effects of strain localization and trapping of volatile-rich deeper magma fragments within tuffisite veins (Schipper et al, 2013;Castro et al, 2014;Cassidy et al, 2015). As a result, individual decompression events could simultaneously elicit fragmentation and vesiculation responses in jutxaposed, decimeter to meter-scale magma domains, with preferential "quarrying" of vesicular domains promoting release of batches of exsolved gas, and boosting the efficiency of gasmagma separation (Castro et al, 2012.…”
Section: Broader Implications For Shallow Conduit Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurement of exsolved gas fluxes and ejected particle velocities during silicic eruptions, combined with petrological characterization (Cassidy et al, 2015), and investigation of trace metal and short-lived radionuclides within tuffisites (Berlo et al, 2013) may be better approaches. The glassy tuffisite veins, however, provide rich textural and volatile records that belie a multi-scale evolutionary complexity that cannot be ignored in the description of silicic conduits that are in transitional explosive-effusive activity.…”
Section: Broader Implications For Shallow Conduit Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processes triggering “vulcanian” gas‐and‐ash explosions at active lava domes remain widely debated as competing hypotheses exist at both all‐encompassing (Chouet et al, ) and volcano‐specific (Hall et al, ) scales. Vulcanian events have been attributed to a range of processes, from the ascent of a fresh batch of bubbly magma in the shallow conduit (Cassidy et al, ) and gas pressure accumulation due to fracture sealing (Kendrick et al, ; Okumura & Sasaki, ) healing (Gardner et al, ; Lamur et al, ) and cyclic gas fluxing (Michaut et al, ) to the development of shear fractures along the margins of volcanic conduits during ascent of highly viscous magma (Lavallée et al, ; Lensky et al, ; Tuffen et al, ). On the other hand, there is a general agreement on the processes that result in fracturing of parts of the dome during explosive activity to allow the ejection of ash‐laden plumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%