2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and simultaneous determination of capecitabine and its metabolites in mouse plasma, mouse serum, and in rabbit bile by high-performance liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommendations for gemcitabine pharmacokinetic analysis, for which CDA regulates the catabolic route [10], specify that CDA blood activity must be inhibited to ensure a faithful analysis. Numerous analytical methods for measuring capecitabine metabolites in plasma have been reported [4,[11][12][13][14]. Among these latter, only one mentioned the use of a CDA inhibitor [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations for gemcitabine pharmacokinetic analysis, for which CDA regulates the catabolic route [10], specify that CDA blood activity must be inhibited to ensure a faithful analysis. Numerous analytical methods for measuring capecitabine metabolites in plasma have been reported [4,[11][12][13][14]. Among these latter, only one mentioned the use of a CDA inhibitor [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Guichard et al (2005) developed an HPLC-MS/MS method to quantify capecitabine, 5′-DFCR, 5′-DFUR and 5-FU, which was validated for mouse plasma, liver and human xenograft tumors, and cross-validated in human plasma and tumor. Dhananjeyan et al (2007) published an elegant method to determine capecitabine, 5′-DFCR, 5′-DFUR and 5-FU in mouse plasma, mouse serum and rabbit bile using HPLC-UV; however the lower limit of quantitation for this method was 1 μg/mL, which is not suffi cient for the clinical studies with capecitabine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We used the approach that is "based on the standard deviation (S.D.) of the response and the slope ( ) associated with the calibration curve" to calculate both LLOD and LLOQ [13,14] wherein LLOD = (S.D. × 3.3)/ ; and LLOQ = (S.D.…”
Section: Llod and Lloq Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%