2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and quantitative determination of critical micelle concentration by automatic continuous mixing and static light scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The band broadening correction was not considered as it did not impact the final results. The refractive index increment (d n /d c ) was determined to be 0.184 ± 0.001, 0.144 ± 0.001, 0.132 ± 0.001, 0.113 ± 0.001, 0.159 ± 0.001, and 0.150 ± 0.001 mL/g for PAM, AM, PAMPSNa, AMPSNa, PDMAAPS, and DMAAPS, respectively, according to a method described in the literature 16, 17. The delay volume, normalization, and RI calibration constant were determined using bovine serum albumin (BSA) 18…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band broadening correction was not considered as it did not impact the final results. The refractive index increment (d n /d c ) was determined to be 0.184 ± 0.001, 0.144 ± 0.001, 0.132 ± 0.001, 0.113 ± 0.001, 0.159 ± 0.001, and 0.150 ± 0.001 mL/g for PAM, AM, PAMPSNa, AMPSNa, PDMAAPS, and DMAAPS, respectively, according to a method described in the literature 16, 17. The delay volume, normalization, and RI calibration constant were determined using bovine serum albumin (BSA) 18…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was chosen mainly for its high density (974 kg m −3 ) and high viscosity (3.4 Pa s at 20°C). Two well‐known nonionic surfactants were used and compared as follows: Triton X‐405 (HLB = 17.9, CMC in water of 0.159 [wt/wt], product of Sigma‐Adrich) and Triton X‐100 (HLB = 13.5, CMC in water of 0.018 [wt/wt], product of Sigma‐Aldrich) 17, 18. Deionized water, with an electrical conductivity of 18.3 MΩ cm, was filtered through a 0.22‐μm Millipore filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential molar mass distribution was carried out according to the common form: x ( M ) = dW( M )/dlog( M ), where W( M ) is the cumulative distribution (the weight fraction of sample having molar mass less than M ). The refractive index increment, d n /d c , was determined to be, respectively, 0.184 ± 0.001 and 0.144 ± 0.001 mL/g for polyacrylamide and acrylamide according to the method described in the literature 30, 31…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%