2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and non-destructive determination of quality parameters in the ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango using a novel handheld near infrared spectrometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Walsh and Subedi (2016) using a Nirvana spectrometer in field reported a DM model performance of R CV 0.94% and RMS CV 0.68%. Lower RMSE P values (0.67 and 0.51%) were observed by Marques et al (2016) using a MicroNIR 1700 in 'Tommy Atkins' mango.…”
Section: Dmmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Walsh and Subedi (2016) using a Nirvana spectrometer in field reported a DM model performance of R CV 0.94% and RMS CV 0.68%. Lower RMSE P values (0.67 and 0.51%) were observed by Marques et al (2016) using a MicroNIR 1700 in 'Tommy Atkins' mango.…”
Section: Dmmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Comparing the performance of the SSC prediction model with other studies, the RMSE CV value of 1.39% was quite similar to the SEP of 1.2% reported by Rungpichayapichet et al (2016) who studied 'Nam Dokmai' and 'Si Thong' mango varieties using a VIS/NIR spectrometer (HandySpec Campo 1000, tec5AG, Oberursel, Germany) on the range of 700-1100 nm (SWNIR). On the other hand, lower SEP values were reported by Saranwong et al (2003) using a 'FT20' spectrometer (Fantec, Japan) on ripe 'Carabao' mangoes (0.40%; R = 0.96 ; 900-1000 nm) and by Marques et al (2016) using a MicroNIR 1700 (VIAVI, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) on the wavelength range of 950-1650 nm (RMSE P of 0.92°Brix) for 'Tommy Atkins' mango.…”
Section: Sscmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coefficient of determination and root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) values were, respectively: 0.92 and 0.55 Brix for SS, 0.67 and 0.51% for DM, 0.50 and 0.17% citric acid for TA, 0.72 and 12.2 N for PF [8]. And the results show that it is feasible to determine quality parameters in the'Tommy Atkins'mango using the new NIR spectrometer.…”
Section: Objective Analysis Based On Near Infrared Technologymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Rungpichayapichet, Mahayothee, Nagle, Khuwijitjaru, and Müller () used a portable VIS‐NIR photo‐diode array spectrometer (HandySpec Field 1000, tec5AG) to study mango fruit quality and maturity and good results were reported for SSC prediction, standard error of prediction (SEP) of 1.2% and a correlation coefficient ( R 2 ) of 0.90, for firmness prediction (SEP of 4.22 N and R 2 of 0.82), and for TA prediction (SEP of 0.38% and R 2 of 0.74). Marques, Freitas, Pimentel, and Pasquini () studying ‘Tommy Atkins’ mangoes used a portable MicroNIR 1700 to predict SSC, DM, TA, and firmness with low root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP), 0.92°Brix, 0.51%, 0.17%, and 12.2 N, respectively. Santos Neto, Assis, Casagrande, Cunha Júnior, and Teixeira () reported the use of a portable F‐750 to predict DM in ‘Palmer’ mango with good results, root mean square error of crossvalidation (RMSE CV ) of 8.3 g.kg −1 and RMSE cv of 8.8 g.kg −1 with a Rnormalc2 of 0.86 and Rcv2 of 0.84.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%