2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and non-destructive detection of chicken adulteration in minced beef using visible near-infrared hyperspectral imaging and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the results in [7][8][9] showed that an HSI system is able to provide significant information for performing classification in a plurality of applications for meat, such as detection of adulteration of minced meat [7], detection of chicken adulteration in minced beef [8], and lamb muscle discrimination [9]. In all of these studies, the models produced misclassification of pixels in pixel-based prediction, although they performed well in the case of sample-based prediction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the results in [7][8][9] showed that an HSI system is able to provide significant information for performing classification in a plurality of applications for meat, such as detection of adulteration of minced meat [7], detection of chicken adulteration in minced beef [8], and lamb muscle discrimination [9]. In all of these studies, the models produced misclassification of pixels in pixel-based prediction, although they performed well in the case of sample-based prediction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this case, it is more practical and reliable to perform a pixel-wise classification (i.e., local) than a sample-wise classification [16]. For dealing with spectral variations, several methods were established and used such as spectral derivatives [5], unit-vector normalization [16], standard normal variates (SNV) [8], and multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) [8]. In [16], SNV and unit-vector normalization were evaluated with regard to the problem of classifying red-meat; SNV performed better than unit-vector normalization in this classification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To minimize the signal noises due to the disturbance of instrument structure and detector sensitivity, the raw hyperspectral reflectance images were normalized into relative hyperspectral reflectance images using white reference and dark reference images, referring to the following formula [18]:…”
Section: Hyperspectral Image Calibration and Region Of Interest (Roi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in order to eliminate the undesired impact, such as random noise, light scattering, and baseline shifts [18], three spectral preprocessing techniques, including standard normal variate (SNV), Savitzky-Golay first derivative (1st Der) (with a second-order polynomial and a five-point window), de-trending (Det) (with a second-order polynomial), two combinations of SNV with 1st Der (SNV + 1st Der) and SNV with Det (SNV + Det), were separately adopted and compared to deal with the absorption spectra prior to the model establishment. SNV is normally applied to remove scatter effect.…”
Section: Spectral Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%