2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and Highly Sensitive Detection of Therapeutically Relevant Oncogenic Driver Mutations in EBUS-TBNA Specimens From Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study by the same group, 28 primarily to assess methods of mutational analysis, also weighed EBUS samples, which were obtained with a 22G needle, without suction, using 2 or more passes. The samples were split: formalin‐fixed for pathological examination; and, for mutational analysis, freshly frozen in 1 mL of saline, then stored at −80°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study by the same group, 28 primarily to assess methods of mutational analysis, also weighed EBUS samples, which were obtained with a 22G needle, without suction, using 2 or more passes. The samples were split: formalin‐fixed for pathological examination; and, for mutational analysis, freshly frozen in 1 mL of saline, then stored at −80°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (25). Approximately 85% of cases are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and tissue analysis is key in the treatment of NSCLC (26,27). Many molecule inhibitors induce rapid and deep responses and confer superior disease control compared with standard platinum doublet chemotherapy (28)(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, TBLC was more likely to obtain fully adequate samples for NGS analysis than EBUS‐TBNA. Previous studies have reported the use of sample collection methods, which include pathological findings, molecular target tests, and NGS analysis, via EBUS‐TBNA for diagnosing lung cancer 15–18,23–26 . In these studies, about 82.8%–95.3% of EBUS‐TBNA samples were successfully utilized in NGS analysis 15–17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the use of sample collection methods, which include pathological findings, molecular target tests, and NGS analysis, via EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing lung cancer. [15][16][17][18][23][24][25][26] In these studies, about 82.8%-95.3% of EBUS-TBNA samples were successfully utilized in NGS analysis. [15][16][17] The current study obtained a similar result showing that the success rate of NGS analysis was 89.4% (fully adequate samples, 36.8%; partly adequate samples, 52.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%