2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04179.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and accurate analyses of silicon and phosphorus in plants using a portable X‐ray fluorescence spectrometer

Abstract: Summary• The elemental analysis of plant material is a frequently employed tool across biological disciplines, yet accurate, convenient and economical methods for the determination of some important elements are currently lacking. For instance, digestion-based techniques are often hazardous and time-consuming and, particularly in the case of silicon (Si), can suffer from low accuracy due to incomplete solubilization and potential volatilization, whilst other methods may require large, expensive and specialised… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
189
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
189
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Omote et al (1995) concluded that while the FP method is effective as a screening tool in instances where estimates of concentrations across a broad range of elements are required, their research on moor vegetation recommended that standard samples with similar composition to unknowns may be necessary to improve predictions. Often, these standards are prepared using similar materials, and for plant analysis for instance, cellulose with spiked concentrations of elements is used (Reidinger et al, 2012) However, in this study, percentage P and Mg determined using the FP method in EDXRF were consistently lower than the ICP-OES values, despite a high correlation (r > 0.80) between methods for both elements. The source of disagreement between EDXRF and ICP-OES methods when FP calibration was used was largely due to lack of accuracy, which reduced the estimates of CCC for both elements.…”
Section: Repeatability and Robustness Testingcontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Omote et al (1995) concluded that while the FP method is effective as a screening tool in instances where estimates of concentrations across a broad range of elements are required, their research on moor vegetation recommended that standard samples with similar composition to unknowns may be necessary to improve predictions. Often, these standards are prepared using similar materials, and for plant analysis for instance, cellulose with spiked concentrations of elements is used (Reidinger et al, 2012) However, in this study, percentage P and Mg determined using the FP method in EDXRF were consistently lower than the ICP-OES values, despite a high correlation (r > 0.80) between methods for both elements. The source of disagreement between EDXRF and ICP-OES methods when FP calibration was used was largely due to lack of accuracy, which reduced the estimates of CCC for both elements.…”
Section: Repeatability and Robustness Testingcontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…For environmental samples such as soils and plants, with large elemental compositions, the presence and predominance of other elements can interfere with the values for elements of interest. These are known as matrix effects and are often overcome by calibrating using simple matrices or synthetic materials spiked with a range of element concentrations (Paltridge et al, 2012;Reidinger et al, 2012). Alternatively, calibration of complex matrices often uses the fundamental parameters (FP) method, first developed in the mid-50s by Sherman (1955).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fresh leaf samples collected were analyzed for total chlorophyll content [9]; ascorbic acid content [10]; proline determination [11]; pH was determined by pH meter after calibrating with buffer solution [12]. The other parameters like relative water content of leaf samples [13]; Electrical conductivity [14]; total nitrogen content and protein content were estimated by Antial et al [15]; sugar content [16]; determination of elements like cadmium, lead were measured by x-ray fluorescence device (made in Germany) [17]. Values of APTI was calculated by method of Singh and Rao [7] by calculating four biochemical parameters where ( ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As medidas foram realizadas segundo metodologia previamente estabelecida 201 , utilizando um equipamento de FRX portável (Niton XL3t900 Analyzer, Thermo Scientific, UK) equipado com um tubo de raios-X e um detector para Si. 206 .…”
Section: Espectrometria De Fluorescência De Raios-x (Frx)unclassified