2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-020-0392-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid (30-second), equipment-free purification of nucleic acids using easy-to-make dipsticks

Abstract: The complexity of current nucleic acid isolation methods limits their use outside of the modern laboratory environment. Here, we describe a fast and affordable method to purify nucleic acids from animal, plant, viral and microbial samples using a cellulose-based dipstick. Nucleic acids can be purified by dipping in-house-made dipsticks into just three solutions: the extract (to bind the nucleic acids), a wash buffer (to remove impurities) and the amplification reaction (to elute the nucleic acids). The speed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
47
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This creates inherent differences among races and ethnic populations, as well as between healthy individuals and individuals vulnerable to diseases 2 . Therefore, the rapid identification of specific NA has enormous potential in disease diagnosis and management 3 . One of the most common applications of NA detection is molecular-based diagnostic tests or NA testing for the diagnosis of various infectious diseases caused by different microbes and pathogens [4][5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates inherent differences among races and ethnic populations, as well as between healthy individuals and individuals vulnerable to diseases 2 . Therefore, the rapid identification of specific NA has enormous potential in disease diagnosis and management 3 . One of the most common applications of NA detection is molecular-based diagnostic tests or NA testing for the diagnosis of various infectious diseases caused by different microbes and pathogens [4][5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the risk of cross-contamination of samples on FTA cards is higher compared with liquid samples collected in separate tubes. A further disadvantage of the FTA cards is the less efficient nucleic acid extraction based on the reduced recovery of the DNA and RNA from the filter paper matrix [ 11 ]. Although the probability of detecting the pathogens on FTA cards is lower than in fresh samples, the cards offer unique advantages for the collection, transportation, and storage of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our analysis highlights the importance of empirically validating these components as main priorities in an assay establishment. tions (Mason & Botella, 2020;Zou et al, 2017). This rapid method can extract nucleic acids from plants, microbes and animals within 30 s while performing comparably to conventional techniques and not requiring pipetting (Sullivan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%