1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1999.00321.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAPD and rep PCR‐based fingerprinting of vascular bacterial pathogens of Musa spp.

Abstract: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with random decamer primers, and primers targeted to conserved repetitive sequences were used to investigate the genetic relationship between strains of Ralstonia solanacearum that cause the ‘moko’ and ‘bugtok’ vascular wilt diseases of banana and plantain (Musa spp.). The closely related bacteria R. pickettii, Pseudomonas syzygii and the banana blood disease bacterium were also included in this study. Data from several PCR fingerprints were collated by cluster ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…R. solanacearum is no exception; many studies revisited its diversity at the genus level (8,9,40), the species complex level (14,26,41), or the ecological level (10,37,39). Hence, as a high-throughput alternative to the full sequencing of entire bacterial genomes, the pangenomic comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarray developed in this study was designed for fine investigation of the phylogenetic diversity of R. solanacearum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. solanacearum is no exception; many studies revisited its diversity at the genus level (8,9,40), the species complex level (14,26,41), or the ecological level (10,37,39). Hence, as a high-throughput alternative to the full sequencing of entire bacterial genomes, the pangenomic comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarray developed in this study was designed for fine investigation of the phylogenetic diversity of R. solanacearum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this method can be very useful for typing of some xanthomonads, it does not provide the necessary resolution or reproducibility to be useful for all species. More recently, a major and comprehensive analysis of the genus was completed (Rademaker et al, 2005) that compared amplicon profiles produced by using PCR primers designed to repeated sequences dispersed in bacterial genomes (Martin et al, 1992;Louws et al, 1994;Thwaites et al, 1999). This study utilized all three commonly used repetitive PCR methods (REP, BOX and ERIC) to produce a high-resolution identification scheme, and encompassed many of the pathovars of X. campestris that could not be resolved in the earlier study by Vauterin…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conserved primers were designed from accrued gyrB alignments from this study and can be used for gyrB amplification from all species. The PCR cycling conditions were 2.5 min at 94 uC, then 30 s at 94 uC, 45 s at 50 uC and 1 min at 68 uC for 34 cycles, then 7 min at 68 uC to end.Purity and yield of PCR product for sequencing were checked by running 5 ml reaction mixture on a 1.5 % agarose gel and poststaining using ethidium bromide, according to standard protocols (Thwaites et al, 1999). The remaining mixture was purified by using a commercial kit to remove residual primers and other reaction components (Wizard PCR Clean-up kit; Promega).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in such a case, a RAPD fingerprint is produced from the bacterial DNA, but this pattern is usually nonreproducible, since the selected genomic fragments to be amplified may change from one experiment to another, resulting in different RAPD fingerprints (29). Therefore, by using a set of eight different bacteria (four X. cynarae, two xanthomonad-like bacteria isolated from artichoke but nonpathogenic to this plant, and two other Xanthomonas species), we selected 40 RAPD primers (out of 340 tested) for their ability to produce reproducible fingerprints as in other studies (7,18,21,31,32). Moreover, we took into account only the intensive bands that are highly reproducible (6,9,13,21) when analyzing RAPD fingerprints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%