“…So we may say briefly, he was not human (ou) de\ a) / nqrwpoj), not as non human (mh\ a) / nqrwpoj), but as from humans being beyond humans and as hyper human having truly become human, and, as for the rest, not having done the things of God as God, nor the things of humans as human, but administering for us a new theandric activity as God having become human (EP 4, 1072BC). 13 Two phrases are here of crucial significance. The first, to negate the things of privation, states that apophatic negation must be sharply differentiated from privative negation (sterēsis, or less commonly elleipsis).…”