2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijmpb-06-2017-0070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking the risk categories in international projects using the TOPSIS method

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the risk categories which are predominant in international projects and to rank them according to their effect on project success. Design/methodology/approach A literature survey of peer-reviewed journal articles, survey reports and books on project management is used as the research methodology. One among the various multi-criteria decision making methods named as Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) has been used to rank … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) techniques have become popular recently in assessing, evaluating, and ranking determinants across diverse sectors. It is considered a powerful tool in dealing with multiple objective problems [27]. The application of various MCDM methods has been successfully demonstrated to prioritize alternatives such as the use of TOPSIS in waste management [22] and risk management [27], decision making trial and evaluation laboratory in international development projects [13], and relationship management [59], analytic network processes in mega construction projects [60], and analytical hierarchy processes in energy conservation and emissions reduction [61].…”
Section: Fuzzy Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) techniques have become popular recently in assessing, evaluating, and ranking determinants across diverse sectors. It is considered a powerful tool in dealing with multiple objective problems [27]. The application of various MCDM methods has been successfully demonstrated to prioritize alternatives such as the use of TOPSIS in waste management [22] and risk management [27], decision making trial and evaluation laboratory in international development projects [13], and relationship management [59], analytic network processes in mega construction projects [60], and analytical hierarchy processes in energy conservation and emissions reduction [61].…”
Section: Fuzzy Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOPSIS is considered as a simple ranking method in both conception and application, which "attempts to choose alternatives that simultaneously have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the farthest distance from the negative ideal solution" [62]. While the positive ideal solution minimizes the cost criteria and maximizes the benefit criteria, the negative ideal solution minimizes the benefit criteria and maximizes the cost criteria [27].…”
Section: Fuzzy Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Abraham et al, 2019;Busdicker & Upendra, 2017;Coronado & Wong, 2014;Dandage, Mantha & Rane, 2018;Kure et al, 2018; …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these studies applied the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) which was introduced by Hwang and Yoon [20] to select the best road freight transportation route. A few of the TOPSIS advantages are a sound logic that represents the rationale of human choice, a scalar value that accounts for both the best and worst alternatives simultaneously, and simple computation processes [21], [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%