2018
DOI: 10.2478/remav-2018-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking the Causative Factors of Mortgage Valuation Inaccuracy in Kaduna Metroplois

Abstract: This paper is aimed at contributing to the scarce empirical literature on mortgage valuation by ranking the factors that influences mortgage valuation inaccuracy in the Kaduna Residential property market. A quantitative research approach using a survey design was adopted and structured closedended questionnaires were designed and administered to 57 registered Estate Surveying and Valuation (ESV) firms in Kaduna metropolis; 51 out of the 57 administered questionnaires were returned and used for analysis. A simp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature, however, abounds on challenges in valuation, particularly when using the sales comparison method. These studies cover a number of issues, such as valuation accuracy (Aliyu, et al, 2018), uncertainty in valuation (French & Gabrielli, 2004;Kucharska-Stasiak, 2013), information asymmetry (Garmaise & Moskowitz, 2004;Firoozi,et al, 2006), valuation variances (Munshifwa, et al, 2016) and others. Thus, the reality is that, in practice, modifications are made to this basic model by practitioners as dictated by the type of property being valued, differences in the volume of market information available, technological advancements, increased client awareness, demands for more accuracy in the assessed values and generally changed dynamics in real estate markets (Addae-Dapaah & Ho, 1996;Aluko, et al, 2004;Appraisal Foundation, 2014;Bogin & Shui, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Review: Application Of Sales Comparison Methods In Real Estate Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature, however, abounds on challenges in valuation, particularly when using the sales comparison method. These studies cover a number of issues, such as valuation accuracy (Aliyu, et al, 2018), uncertainty in valuation (French & Gabrielli, 2004;Kucharska-Stasiak, 2013), information asymmetry (Garmaise & Moskowitz, 2004;Firoozi,et al, 2006), valuation variances (Munshifwa, et al, 2016) and others. Thus, the reality is that, in practice, modifications are made to this basic model by practitioners as dictated by the type of property being valued, differences in the volume of market information available, technological advancements, increased client awareness, demands for more accuracy in the assessed values and generally changed dynamics in real estate markets (Addae-Dapaah & Ho, 1996;Aluko, et al, 2004;Appraisal Foundation, 2014;Bogin & Shui, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Review: Application Of Sales Comparison Methods In Real Estate Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of factors were noted as instrumental for the stray of values from the tolerable margin of error. These are valuation methodology employed, client pressure, inadequate academic training, dearth of market evidence, insufficient experience, property characteristics, complexity of the subject property, inexperience in valuation practice, amongst others (Oduyemi et al, 2016;Ajibola, 2010;Aliyu et al, 2018) and if left unchecked as Effiong and Mendie (2019) argued, will lead to upsurge in lawsuits against valuers. Therefore, this study aims to assess valuation accuracy in two extremely different residential property markets in Nigeria (Minna and Abuja), identify the significant causes of valuation inaccuracy and propose measures that could mitigate valuation inaccuracy in these residential property markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical role of the valuation function indicates the importance of accurate valuation outcomes. However, empirical studies have confirmed the existence of inaccurate valuations globally (see for example, Aliyu et al ., 2018; Asnakew and Amogne, 2021; Babawale and Omirin, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%