2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-016-9685-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking software components for reuse based on non-functional properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A component ranking method based on non-dominated sorting for the purpose of software components reuse is presented in [19] in which a specification of the relative importance of non-functional properties is used for a partial ordering. In addition, components' coupling has been used as a measure for the external and internal dependencies between classes; however, such measure is restricted to the entry class of candidates determined by test-driven search evaluation.…”
Section: The Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A component ranking method based on non-dominated sorting for the purpose of software components reuse is presented in [19] in which a specification of the relative importance of non-functional properties is used for a partial ordering. In addition, components' coupling has been used as a measure for the external and internal dependencies between classes; however, such measure is restricted to the entry class of candidates determined by test-driven search evaluation.…”
Section: The Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing more advanced mechanisms for ranking components based on quality criteria would thus constitute a significant step forward towards component reuse. In (Kessel and Atkinson 2016), the authors propose an effective and reliable method for ranking software components based on their non-functional properties, without requiring users to provide quantitative weighting information. Non-functional criteria, designated by software metrics with only minimal information about their relative importance, are specified.…”
Section: Papers In the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%